PMCPA Case Analysis

Over 2,000 real rulings β€” analysed for what they mean to your team. Published every day.

All Cases PMCPA Case of the Week PMCPA Cases

Showing 1914 cases

2007
CASE
AUTH/2006/5/07 GlaxoSmithKline

GSK breach over Seretide TORCH mortality display: non-significant β€œ16.5% risk reduction” presented too prominently (AUTH/2006/5/07)

A pharmacist complained GSK’s Seretide TORCH mortality exhibition panel highlighted a 16.5% risk reduction (p=0.096). PMCPA ruled it didn’t make non-significance clear…

2007
CASE
AUTH/2057/10/07 Gilead Sciences

GSK v Gilead: Truvada leavepieces and over‑interpretation of non‑inferiority (AUTH/2057/10/07)

Gilead’s Truvada BICOMBO leavepieces implied superiority and overstated lipid benefits without clinical context and without reflecting SPC safety info. Breaches of Clauses…

2006
CASE
AUTH/1896/10/06 Eli Lilly

AUTH/1896/10/06: Anonymous v Lilly β€” Alleged inappropriate hospitality (No breach)

Anonymous complaint alleged Lilly-sponsored Heathrow meeting was a social get-together with music/cultural programme. Panel had due diligence concerns but found no evidence…

2007
CASE
AUTH/1968/2/07 Genus Pharmaceuticals

Anonymous v Genus and ProStrakan: Tabphyn MR ad ruled a β€œhanging comparison” on price claim (AUTH/1968/2/07, AUTH/1969/2/07)

A Tabphyn MR journal ad claimed β€œSpend fewer pennies on the treatment of BPH”. PMCPA ruled it a hanging comparison (breach Clause…

2007
CASE
AUTH/1959/2/07 Grünenthal ⭐ Case of the Week

GrΓΌnenthal: Versatis budget impact brochure misled on β€œTotal NHS cost” comparison (AUTH/1959/2/07)

A Versatis budget impact brochure compared β€œTotal NHS cost” vs gabapentin but didn’t clearly define what costs were included. The PMCPA found…

2006
CASE
AUTH/1931/12/06 Teva

AUTH/1931/12/06: Practice Manager v Teva (Qvar) β€” conduct of a representative (no breach)

A practice manager alleged a Teva rep was aggressive, demanded an immediate meeting and implied patients would suffer if advice wasn’t followed.…

2006
CASE
AUTH/1901/10/06 GlaxoSmithKline

AUTH/1901/10/06: β€˜Dear Practice Nurse’ Rotarix letter sent to non-prescribers – No breach (GSK)

A PCT pharmacist complained GSK promoted Rotarix to practice nurses (non-prescribers). PMCPA found it reasonable given nurses’ role in vaccine administration/ordering and…

2006
CASE
AUTH/1880/8/06 Merck Sharp & Dohme

AUTH/1880/8/06: Consultant Physician v Merck Sharp & Dohme (Market research survey) – No breach

A consultant challenged an MSD-commissioned market research survey that asked HCPs to nominate other specialists. Panel had concerns (transparency on questionnaire, Β£25…

2017
CASE
AUTH/3007/12/17 Vifor Pharma

AUTH/3007/12/17: Director v Vifor Fresenius (Velphoro) β€” clinical trial disclosure review outwith scope (No breach)

PMCPA review of Vifor Fresenius clinical trial disclosure for Velphoro was found outwith the scope of the 2016 ABPI Code. No breach…

2017
CASE
AUTH/2967/8/17 Shire ⭐ Case of the Week

AUTH/2967/8/17 – Consultant v Shire: Omission of prescribing information and other obligatory information (No breach / out of scope)

Complaint about omission of prescribing information/obligatory information. PMCPA concluded no breach and that the matter was outwith the scope of the ABPI…

2014
CASE
AUTH/2692/1/14 Lundbeck

AUTH/2692/1/14 & AUTH/2693/1/14: Anonymous consultant physician v Lundbeck and Takeda (Brintellix) – out of scope/no breach

Complaint about promotion of Brintellix. PMCPA recorded no breach because the matter was outwith the scope of the ABPI Code. No case…

2013
CASE
AUTH/2632/8/13 Eli Lilly

AUTH/2632/8/13: Anonymous v Lilly β€” Meeting sponsorship (outwith scope; no breach)

Anonymous complaint about Lilly meeting sponsorship. PMCPA concluded the matter was outwith the scope of the ABPI Code (2012). No breach and…

2006
CASE
AUTH/1833/5/06 Allen

AUTH/1833/5/06: AstraZeneca v GlaxoSmithKline β€” CONCEPT study leavepiece found misleading for missing dosing context

AstraZeneca challenged a GSK leavepiece on the CONCEPT asthma study. The Panel ruled it misleading for omitting key context on average doses…

2006
CASE
AUTH/1789/1/06 AstraZeneca

AstraZeneca β€˜Happy Birthday’ Arimidex mailing envelope ruled disguised promotion (AUTH/1789/1/06)

An Arimidex mailing used an envelope printed β€œHappy Birthday” with candles and no company identifiers. The PMCPA ruled it gave a misleading…

2007
CASE
AUTH/2023/7/07 Pfizer ⭐ Case of the Week

Pfizer: Champix GP referral tear-off pad seen by patients promoted a POM and undermined GP prescribing (AUTH/2023/7/07)

A Champix GP referral letter pad used by smoking cessation advisers/pharmacists was handed to patients to take to GPs. PMCPA found exaggerated…

Ask questions about any PMCPA case

Anzal, our PMCPA rulings expert, has knowledge of over 2,000 published cases β€” ask about precedents, clauses, and how they apply to your situation.

⭐ Flagship Programme

AQP Flagship Path — the complete UK ABPI signatory programme

12 modules. 12 weeks. Final Signatory readiness. The industry standard for ABPI Code signatories — £995 + VAT.

Enrol — AQP Path Learn more

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week β€” free.

Subscribe Free
🎓 AQP Training