ABPI Code Mentorship Training

This mentorship is designed for pharma professionals who work with ABPI decisions day-to-day: originators, medical/scientific/marketing reviewers, AQPs, compliance colleagues, and final signatories. It’s especially useful for teams who want faster approvals with fewer iterations and stronger, more defensible claims.

You’ll build signatory-ready judgement across the areas that trigger most rework and risk—claims, meetings/congress activity, digital/social, patient-facing/public content, and transfers of value. The outcome is clearer decision-making, cleaner evidence logic, and fewer “back-and-forth” cycles.

Each week you’ll get a short learning module plus a supporting podcast, followed by a live session to apply it to practical scenarios and real-world patterns from completed PMCPA cases. Most teams find the learning is immediately usable in current job bags.

No. We focus on practical judgement and how to think like a signatory—what good looks like, what creates risk, and how to make decisions that stand up to scrutiny. Clauses are used when helpful, but the core is application and decision-making.

Yes—sessions are grounded in real patterns from completed PMCPA cases (in an educational way). The point is to show how issues arise in practice, how they’re interpreted, and what to do differently next time.

Yes. The programme ends with a hands-on workshop that pulls everything together, stress-tests judgement, and helps teams standardise what “acceptable” looks like across Marketing, Medical, and Compliance.

Each participant receives an individual 1:1 feedback session in a viva-style format—focused on strengthening reasoning, identifying blind spots, and improving how you justify decisions. This is often where confidence increases fastest.

Absolutely. Team cohorts are one of the best use-cases because it creates a shared “decision language” across functions and reduces internal inconsistency. We can tailor examples and exercises to your therapy area and material types.

Yes. The programme can be aligned to your internal workflows so learning translates directly into better job bags, smoother reviews, and fewer late-stage escalations.

Yes—participants get practical tools and frameworks (e.g., decision checklists, claim-strengthening logic, and risk spotting prompts), plus case-based learning they can refer back to.

Typically online to make it easy for busy teams, but the end workshop can also be delivered in-person if needed (depending on location and scheduling).

Click Book a Call and share your team size and the types of materials you want to improve (e.g., job bags, meetings, congress, digital). We’ll confirm fit, tailor the focus areas, and agree dates.