AUTH/2967/8/17 – Consultant v Shire: Omission of prescribing information and other obligatory information (No breach / out of scope) | PMCPA Case

📊

Key facts

⌄

Case number	AUTH/2967/8/17
Complainant	Consultant
Company	Shire
Issue	Omission of prescribing information and other obligatory information
Complaint received	08 August 2017
Completed	21 November 2017
Applicable Code year	2016
Decision	No breach; outwith the scope of the Code (out of scope)
Clauses cited	Not stated
Sanctions	Not stated

Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI

🎬 Expert Video Walkthrough

🎬

Video walkthrough — coming for members

Subscribe now and get expert video analysis for every case as we publish them.

Subscribe — from £299/yr

📋

⌄

A consultant complained about an alleged omission of prescribing information and other obligatory information.
The complaint was made against Shire.
Case reference: AUTH/2967/8/17.
Complaint received: 08 August 2017.
Applicable Code year: 2016.
Case completed: 21 November 2017.

⚖️

⌄

🔒

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value

£249/year

Annual — save £99

£29/mo

Monthly

Join Now — Instant Access

⭐ Business Intelligence Access

See the full compliance picture for every pharma company

291 Company Intelligence Reports — breach patterns, appeal history, industry ranking, PDF export.

Request Access →