AUTH/1901/10/06: ‘Dear Practice Nurse’ Rotarix letter sent to non-prescribers – No breach (GSK)

📅 2006 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

Case numberAUTH/1901/10/06
ComplainantPrimary care trust chief pharmacist/associate director of public health
CompanyGlaxoSmithKline UK Ltd
ProductRotarix (rotavirus vaccine)
Material‘Dear Practice Nurse’ letter (ref ROT/LTR/06/26848/1c)
Main issuePromotion sent to non-prescribers; concern prescribers did not receive information
Clauses consideredClauses 9.1 and 12.1
DecisionNo breach of Clause 12.1; no breach of Clause 9.1
Complaint received16 October 2006
Case completed15 December 2006
Applicable Code year2006
AppealNo appeal

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
🎬 Expert Video Walkthrough
🎬
Video walkthrough — coming for members
Subscribe now and get expert video analysis for every case as we publish them.
Subscribe — from £299/yr
📋

What happened

  • A primary care trust chief pharmacist/associate director of public health complained that a ‘Dear Practice Nurse’ letter about Rotarix (rotavirus vaccine) was sent to non-prescribers.
  • The complainant said practices reported that none of the information seemed to have been sent to prescribers and asked whether it was ABPI policy to target non-prescribers without providing information to prescribers.
  • The letter introduced Rotarix as the first gastroenteritis vaccine in Europe for infants from six weeks of age, included clinical data, the dose schedule in the context of UK routine childhood vaccinations, and information on how to order the vaccine.
  • GSK said the letter was part of a coordinated launch and follow-up mailing to prescribers and administrators of paediatric vaccines (including lead paediatric vaccine GPs and practice nurses).
  • GSK described a follow-up mailing strategy (three groups of practices) to audit responses; it acknowledged that in 52 practices a branch surgery nurse might receive the follow-up while the lead prescriber at the main surgery might not receive that follow-up, but stated the lead prescriber would have received the original launch mailing.
  • GSK noted ~800 accredited nurse prescribers could prescribe from a full formulary, but most nurses could not prescribe vaccines unless a patient group direction was authorised; many were involved in administration and ordering.
⚖️

Outcome

  • No breach of the Code.
  • No breach of Clause 12.1.
  • No breach of Clause 9.1 (high standards maintained).
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

⭐ Business Intelligence Access

See the full compliance picture for every pharma company

291 Company Intelligence Reports — breach patterns, appeal history, industry ranking, PDF export.

Request Access →
⭐ Flagship Programme

AQP Flagship Path — the complete UK ABPI signatory programme

12 modules. 12 weeks. Final Signatory readiness. The industry standard for ABPI Code signatories — £995 + VAT.

Enrol — AQP Path Learn more

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free
🎓 AQP Training