Every PMCPA ruling since 2005 — searchable and filterable by company, clause, and ABPI Code version.
Case Library Membership
Search free — but unlock advanced filters to find every case involving a specific company or clause.
Already a member? Sign in →
Case Library Membership
inc. VAT
inc. VAT · cancel any time
Secure payment via Stripe
Need access for your team?
Company licences available for compliance teams, medical affairs, and training programmes.
Get a team quote →1,930 cases found
The MHRA complained that a Zoladex journal advertisement referenced the MHRA. The Panel ruled this breached Clause 9.5 because such references are…
AstraZeneca self-reported an uncertified promotional email about Crestor sent to a dispensing practice. The email and attached slides lacked prescribing information and…
Cephalon challenged ProStrakan leavepieces claiming Abstral provided rapid relief from 10 minutes. The Panel found the claim inconsistent with the Abstral SPC,…
A health professional complained about an unsolicited email advertising a Gilead fellowship programme. The Panel found the email was non-promotional and ruled…
Anonymous GP alleged a representative’s hospitality, venue ownership and side businesses created conflicts/inducement concerns. AstraZeneca investigated meetings and payments. Panel raised perception…
A GP challenged a Prescriber journal ad for Micardis/Micardis Plus. The Panel found the headline implied long-term cardiovascular benefit inconsistent with the…
A journal-lookalike supplement reporting a company-run symposium was presented as a sponsored independent forum report. The Panel ruled it was disguised promotion,…
Cephalon challenged ProStrakan’s claim that Abstral provided rapid relief from 10 minutes. The Panel found the claim inconsistent with the Abstral SPC,…
A health professional received an unsolicited email about Gilead’s UK and Ireland Fellowship Programme and queried how his private address was obtained…
Anonymous GP alleged a representative’s venue ownership, free drinks and sports team sponsorship created conflicts and inducement. Panel found concerns about perception…
A GP challenged a Prescriber journal ad for Micardis and Micardis Plus. The Panel ruled the headline implied unproven long-term cardiovascular benefits,…
A journal-lookalike insert reporting a “UK Psychiatry Forum” was ruled disguised promotion because it was output from a company-run promotional symposium and…
A GP received an unsolicited promotional email about MacroBid via an agency. The Panel and Appeal Board found no evidence of prior,…
Roche challenged two GSK corporate press releases about lapatinib (Tykerb/Tyverb). The Panel ruled one release misleading on adverse events (risk–benefit not fairly…
A GP complained about large promotional emails sent on Sandoz’s behalf. The Panel found the email was promotional but could not determine…
Our PMCPA rulings expert has knowledge of over 1,900 published cases — ask about precedents, clauses, and how they apply to your situation.
One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.
