PMCPA Case Library

Every PMCPA ruling since 2005 — searchable and filterable by company, clause, and ABPI Code version.

1,930
Cases
291
Companies
154
Clauses
6
Code Versions

or browse all 154 ABPI clause guides ↗

Case Library Membership

Filter by Company & ABPI Clause

Search free — but unlock advanced filters to find every case involving a specific company or clause.

Filter 1,930+ cases by any of 291 companies
Filter by any of 154 ABPI Code clauses
Filter by Code version (2016, 2019, 2021…)
Full-text keyword search across all cases
Cancel any time

Already a member? Sign in →

Case Library Membership

Best value
£249 /year Save £99

inc. VAT

£29 /month

inc. VAT · cancel any time

Unlock Full Access →

Secure payment via Stripe


Need access for your team?

Company licences available for compliance teams, medical affairs, and training programmes.

Get a team quote →

1,930 cases found

2008
CASE
2008 Code

AUTH/2180/11/08 & AUTH/2181/11/08: Ezetrol ‘New NICE technology appraisal’ ad in Pulse – no breach

Complaint said an Ezetrol Pulse ad implying “New NICE” guidance was misleading vs NICE lipid guideline. Panel found headline clearly referred to…

2008
CASE
2008 Code Pfizer Clause 7.2 Clause 7.3 Clause 7.4

Pfizer: Lipitor journal ad – economic modelling percentages presented as clinical absolutes (AUTH/2184/11/08)

A Lipitor journal ad cited economic modelling (“37%” vs “82%”) on cholesterol target attainment. PMCPA found the bold percentages misleading and not…

2008
CASE
2008 Code Schering-Plough Clause 3.2 Clause 7.2

Schering-Plough: NeoClarityn ‘triple stopping power’ ad misleading on ‘anti-inflammatory’ claim (AUTH/2185/11/08)

A NeoClarityn journal ad implied clinically supported anti-inflammatory action. PMCPA found it inconsistent with the SPC and misleading, ruling breaches of Clauses…

2008
CASE
2008 Code AstraZeneca

AstraZeneca: Crestor journal ad “Finding cholesterol targets harder to hit?” (AUTH/2186/11/08) – No breach

A pharmacist alleged a Crestor journal ad implied NICE cholesterol targets had been reduced and omitted first-line NICE advice. The Panel found…

2019
CASE
2019 Code AstraZeneca Clause 1 Clause 2

AstraZeneca sales manager’s personal Instagram post about KOL nurse ruled in scope and unethical; conflict of interest not declared (AUTH/3180/4/19)

A respiratory nurse complained about a sales manager’s personal Facebook/Instagram posts referencing a nurse KOL. Panel found one Instagram post in scope…

2008
CASE
2008 Code Takeda Clause 3 Clause 7

AUTH/2164/9/08: MSD v Takeda – Actos/Competact ad implied CV event reduction and misused “independent”

A pioglitazone journal ad implied CV event reduction as part of the product’s benefits and called a Takeda-funded meta-analysis “independent”. Breaches of…

2008
CASE
2008 Code Merz Pharma UK Clause 7.2 Clause 7.8 Clause 7.10

AUTH/2177/10/08: Allergan v Merz Pharma (Xeomin leavepiece) – misleading implied clinical advantage from “free from complexing proteins”

A Xeomin leavepiece used a true “free from complexing proteins” fact alongside a horse chestnut visual, implying an unproven clinical advantage and…

2008
CASE
2008 Code Stiefel Laboratories

AUTH/2182/11/08: Genus v Stiefel Laboratories (Oilatum) — alleged inappropriate rebate (No breach)

Genus alleged Stiefel offered a PCT a cash rebate if Oilatum was reinstated on formulary (inducement to prescribe). Accounts conflicted and evidence…

2008
CASE
2008 Code Allergan Clause 7.2 Clause 7.3 Clause 7.10 Clause 9.1 Clause 15.9

AUTH/2183/11/08: Merz Pharma v Allergan – misleading potency comparison for Botox vs Xeomin

Allergan materials and representative messaging suggested Xeomin was ~70% as potent as Botox based on animal assay data. PMCPA found the comparison…

2008
CASE
2008 Code ProStrakan Group

AUTH/2189/12/08: General Practitioner v ProStrakan — therapy review service (no breach)

A GP alleged a calcium/vitamin D service lacked proper practice authorisation and involved patient letters and promotion of Adcal-D3. The Panel found…

2008
CASE
2008 Code AstraZeneca

AstraZeneca: alleged proactive discussion of unpublished JUPITER (Crestor) data by a representative (AUTH/2190/12/08, AUTH/2194/12/08)

Two anonymous hospital HCPs alleged an AstraZeneca rep initiated discussion of unpublished/out-of-licence JUPITER (Crestor) data. Panel had concerns about internal briefings but…

2008
CASE
2008 Code Roche Products Clause 7.2 Clause 7.3 Clause 7.4 Clause 7.8 Clause 7.10 Clause 8.1

AUTH/2191/12/08: Roche misleading comparative and “cost-effective” claims in Bondronat hospital detail aid (Novartis complaint)

Roche’s Bondronat hospital detail aid was ruled misleading for “innovative” branding, renal safety wording, implied infusion-time comparisons, small-sample resource claims and ASCO…

2008
CASE
2008 Code Pfizer Clause 25

AUTH/2192/12/08: Pfizer voluntary admission—withdrawn Lipitor “fireman” ad re-published (breach of undertaking)

Pfizer admitted a Lipitor journal ad previously ruled in breach reappeared in Practitioner. Panel found breach of Clause 25 (undertaking). Appeal overturned…

2008
CASE
2008 Code Otsuka Pharmaceuticals Clause 8.2 Clause 9.1 Clause 15.2

AUTH/2195/12/08: General Practitioner v Otsuka – Representative email to practice manager (conduct and disparaging comments)

A GP practice complained about an Otsuka representative’s unprofessional email (sent from work email) containing disparaging comments about GPs. Breaches were found…

2008
CASE
2008 Code Merck Serono

AUTH/2193/12/08: Anonymous v Merck Serono – Pergoveris targeting emails (No breach)

Anonymous complaint alleged Merck Serono encouraged off-licence promotion of Pergoveris via internal emails targeting Menopur IVF/ICSI cycles. Panel found emails unclear on…

1116117118119120121122129

Ask questions about any PMCPA case

Our PMCPA rulings expert has knowledge of over 1,900 published cases — ask about precedents, clauses, and how they apply to your situation.

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free