AUTH/2182/11/08: Genus v Stiefel Laboratories (Oilatum) — alleged inappropriate rebate (No breach)

📅 2008 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

Case numberAUTH/2182/11/08
PartiesGenus Pharmaceuticals Ltd v Stiefel Laboratories (UK) Limited
Product(s)Oilatum Cream (Stiefel); Cetraben (Genus)
IssueAlleged inappropriate cash rebate linked to reinstatement on a PCT formulary
Complaint received6 November 2008
Case completed27 January 2009
Applicable Code year2008
Clauses considered2, 18.1
DecisionNo breach
AppealNo appeal

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
🎬 Expert Video Walkthrough
🎬
Video walkthrough — coming for members
Subscribe now and get expert video analysis for every case as we publish them.
Subscribe — from £299/yr
📋

What happened

  • Genus (supplier of Cetraben) complained about Stiefel’s marketing of Oilatum Cream.
  • Genus said it received an email (13 October) from a primary care trust (PCT) stating Stiefel had offered a rebate on the price difference between Cetraben and Oilatum if the PCT reinstated Oilatum on the formulary.
  • Genus alleged this breached Clause 18.1 (Terms of Trade) and amounted to an inducement to prescribe, bringing the industry into disrepute (Clause 2).
  • Stiefel denied any breach and said a meeting (7 October) covered dissemination of NICE atopic dermatitis guidance and discussion of local rebate schemes; Stiefel said no rebate agreement was made and discussions were information sharing only.
  • The Panel noted cash rebate schemes relate to prices/margins/discounts, but Stiefel did not establish whether such schemes were exempt as being in regular use by a significant proportion of the industry on 1 January 1993.
  • The Panel found the parties’ accounts differed and it could not establish, on the balance of probabilities, what actually occurred.
⚖️

Outcome

  • No breach of Clause 18.1.
  • As a consequence, no breach of Clause 2.
  • No appeal.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

⭐ Business Intelligence Access

See the full compliance picture for every pharma company

291 Company Intelligence Reports — breach patterns, appeal history, industry ranking, PDF export.

Request Access →
⭐ Flagship Programme

AQP Flagship Path — the complete UK ABPI signatory programme

12 modules. 12 weeks. Final Signatory readiness. The industry standard for ABPI Code signatories — £995 + VAT.

Enrol — AQP Path Learn more

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free
🎓 AQP Training