AstraZeneca: Symbicort Turbohaler promo email subject line missing generic name (AUTH/3664/6/22)

📅 2022 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

CaseAUTH/3664/6/22
CompanyAstraZeneca
ProductSymbicort Turbohaler (budesonide, formoterol fumarate)
Material typePromotional email
Main issueSubject line used brand name without non-proprietary name immediately adjacent at first appearance; concerns about certification arrangements
ComplainantAnonymous, contactable complainant (described themselves as a health professional); also taken up by the Director
Applicable Code2021
Breach clausesClause 5.1; Clause 12.3
No breach clausesClause 2; Clause 3.3; Clause 5.1 (in relation to alleged breach of undertaking)
Undertaking allegationAlleged breach of undertaking from Case AUTH/1800/2/06; Panel found cases sufficiently different and ruled no breach of Clause 3.3
SanctionsUndertaking received; additional sanctions not stated
Complaint received21 June 2022
Case completed8 June 2023
AppealNo appeal

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
🎬 Expert Video Walkthrough
🎬
Video walkthrough — coming for members
Subscribe now and get expert video analysis for every case as we publish them.
Subscribe — from £299/yr
📋

What happened

  • An anonymous, contactable health professional complained about a promotional email for Symbicort Turbohaler (budesonide, formoterol fumarate).
  • The email subject line was: ‘AstraZeneca promotional email: Symbicort Turbohaler – Device matters when prescribing MART’.
  • The complainant alleged the brand name appeared in the subject line without the generic name, raising Clause 12.3.
  • The complainant also alleged this repeated an earlier issue (Case AUTH/1800/2/06) and therefore breached an undertaking (Clause 3.3), and asked the Authority to consider Clause 5.1.
  • AstraZeneca accepted the non-proprietary name was not included adjacent to the brand name in the subject line at first mention and accepted a breach of Clause 12.3.
  • AstraZeneca said the subject line was changed after the review round and the change was not flagged to reviewers/signatories; the signatory did not realise the final email form/attachments included an amended subject line.
  • The Panel noted the non-proprietary name (budesonide/formoterol) appeared near the top of the email body, but the subject line was the first appearance and might be the only part read.
  • The Panel was concerned the certified document did not include the subject line as part of the final form uploaded for certification; it was effectively in meta-data/attachments rather than integral to the certified item.
⚖️

Outcome

  • Breach of Clause 12.3 (non-proprietary name not immediately adjacent to brand name at first appearance in an electronic advertisement).
  • Breach of Clause 5.1 (failing to maintain high standards) due to concerns about certification arrangements (subject line not integral to the certified final form).
  • No breach of Clause 3.3 (requirement to comply with an undertaking) in relation to the alleged breach of undertaking from Case AUTH/1800/2/06.
  • No breach of Clause 2 (discredit to the industry) in relation to the alleged breach of undertaking.
  • No breach of Clause 5.1 in relation to the alleged breach of undertaking (the Panel treated this separately from the certification-arrangements breach).
  • No appeal.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

⭐ Business Intelligence Access

See the full compliance picture for every pharma company

291 Company Intelligence Reports — breach patterns, appeal history, industry ranking, PDF export.

Request Access →
⭐ Flagship Programme

AQP Flagship Path — the complete UK ABPI signatory programme

12 modules. 12 weeks. Final Signatory readiness. The industry standard for ABPI Code signatories — £995 + VAT.

Enrol — AQP Path Learn more

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free
🎓 AQP Training