Allergan: Juvéderm UK website links alleged to promote Botox via US sites and social media (AUTH/3625/3/22) – No breach

📅 2022 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

Case numberAUTH/3625/3/22
CompanyAllergan
ComplainantContactable complainant (prescribing pharmacist providing consultancy services to the pharmaceutical industry)
Product(s)Juvéderm (Hyaluronic Acid Filler; medical device); Botox (botulinum toxin type A; prescription only medicine)
ChannelWebsites and social media links (Instagram, Facebook, YouTube referenced)
Core allegationUsing a UK medical device website to promote a POM (Botox) via links to US/global sites and social media
Applicable Code2021
Clauses considered2, 8.1, 12.1, 12.3, 12.6, 12.9, 15, 16, 26.1, 26.2
DecisionNo breach
Complaint received20 March 2022
Case completed12 April 2023
AppealNo appeal

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
🎬 Expert Video Walkthrough
🎬
Video walkthrough — coming for members
Subscribe now and get expert video analysis for every case as we publish them.
Subscribe — from £299/yr
📋

What happened

  • A prescribing pharmacist complained that Allergan used its medical device website (Juvéderm UK) to indirectly promote its prescription only medicine (Botox) across digital and social media channels.
  • The complainant alleged users were “two clicks away” from Botox promotion by following links from juvederm.co.uk to Allergan’s global/US sites and then to Botox Cosmetic pages and US social media (Instagram/Facebook/YouTube).
  • The complainant said there was no clear warning that users were leaving a UK website and being taken to US-directed content.
  • Allergan argued the referenced Botox content was on US-owned websites, intended for US residents, and required multiple active clicks from the UK device site; it also argued Juvéderm (a medical device) content was outside the Code unless it referenced a POM.
  • The Panel considered it reasonably foreseeable that some users could click through, and noted the “leaving the UK site” point could have been clearer; it therefore treated the matter as within scope on the facts.
  • However, the Panel noted the initial link took users to a global/US corporate homepage (not a product page) and multiple further clicks were required before any Botox promotional information could be viewed.
⚖️

Outcome

  • No breach of the ABPI Code of Practice (2021).
  • The Panel did not consider the circumstances showed Allergan UK used its medical device to promote Botox to the public or health professionals in the UK as alleged.
  • For Clauses 15 and 16, the Panel noted the complainant cited them generally without specific reasons/sub-clauses; the allegation was not made out.
  • No appeal.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

⭐ Business Intelligence Access

See the full compliance picture for every pharma company

291 Company Intelligence Reports — breach patterns, appeal history, industry ranking, PDF export.

Request Access →
⭐ Flagship Programme

AQP Flagship Path — the complete UK ABPI signatory programme

12 modules. 12 weeks. Final Signatory readiness. The industry standard for ABPI Code signatories — £995 + VAT.

Enrol — AQP Path Learn more

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free
🎓 AQP Training