AUTH/3569/10/21: Pierre Fabre – alleged public promotion of Nerlynx via awards website (No breach)

📅 2021 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

Case numberAUTH/3569/10/21
CompanyPierre Fabre
ComplainantMember of the public/media (as described)
ProductNerlynx (neratinib maleate)
AllegationPromotion of a prescription-only medicine to the public via an open-access awards website video including brand name and indication
Material/channelCompilation video on a Pharmaceutical Marketing Awards website (open access)
Applicable Code year2021
Clauses considered2, 5.1, 26.1
Panel decisionNo breach of Clauses 26.1, 5.1, and consequently 2
Complaint received12 October 2021
Case completed5 July 2022
AppealNo appeal
SanctionsNone stated

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
🎬 Expert Video Walkthrough
🎬
Video walkthrough — coming for members
Subscribe now and get expert video analysis for every case as we publish them.
Subscribe — from £299/yr
📋

What happened

  • A complainant (member of the public/media) alleged that Nerlynx (neratinib maleate) had been promoted to the public.
  • The allegation related to an advertising/marketing agency using materials including the brand name and indication in connection with sponsorship of an awards event.
  • A compilation video containing clips was hosted on an open-access Pharmaceutical Marketing Awards website; the complainant pointed to a specific scene (around 18 seconds).
  • Pierre Fabre UK said it first became aware of the compilation video when contacted by the PMCPA.
  • The agency confirmed the clips came from a Pierre Fabre Global video (NERL-IVID-WO-0003133, Feb 2020) approved for use outside the UK.
  • Pierre Fabre UK stated the video was not its UK-certified internal video (UK/NER/0079, certified 10 Jan 2020 for internal use only) because UK disclaimers/job code/date were absent.
  • Pierre Fabre said the agency posted the video without prior knowledge/approval of Pierre Fabre UK or Pierre Fabre Global, contrary to the Master Services Agreement (MSA) which required prior consent for any use.
  • Pierre Fabre contacted the agency and the Pharmaceutical Marketing Society and the video was removed on 18 October 2021.
⚖️

Outcome

  • No breach of Clause 26.1 (promotion to the public) – the Panel considered that although anyone could access the awards website, it was not aimed at the general public in the particular circumstances.
  • No breach of Clause 5.1 (high standards) – the Panel found no evidence Pierre Fabre failed to maintain high standards; it had been let down by an agency working for its global affiliate.
  • No breach of Clause 2 (bringing discredit) – consequentially, no breach was ruled.
  • No appeal.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

⭐ Business Intelligence Access

See the full compliance picture for every pharma company

291 Company Intelligence Reports — breach patterns, appeal history, industry ranking, PDF export.

Request Access →
⭐ Flagship Programme

AQP Flagship Path — the complete UK ABPI signatory programme

12 modules. 12 weeks. Final Signatory readiness. The industry standard for ABPI Code signatories — £995 + VAT.

Enrol — AQP Path Learn more

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free
🎓 AQP Training