Amgen disease awareness newspaper ad ruled misleading due to “flu jab alongside your osteoporosis medicine” wording (AUTH/3439/12/20)

📅 2020 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

CaseAUTH/3439/12/20
CompanyAmgen Ltd
ComplainantContactable complainant (described self as a health professional)
MaterialNational newspaper/magazine advertisement (ref GB-PRO-0920-00028)
Key wording at issue“...call your GP, get your flu jab alongside your osteoporosis medicine”
ChannelFive newspapers and magazines
Run dates6–27 October 2020
Complaint received7 December 2020
Case completed7 July 2021
Applicable Code year2019
Breach findingsClause 9.1
No breach findingsClauses 26.1, 26.2, 2 (and no breach of Clause 9.1 regarding implication flu vaccine was an Amgen medicine)
SanctionUndertaking received
AppealNo appeal

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
🎬 Expert Video Walkthrough
🎬
Video walkthrough — coming for members
Subscribe now and get expert video analysis for every case as we publish them.
Subscribe — from £299/yr
📋

What happened

  • A health professional complained about a national newspaper advertisement placed by Amgen Ltd (ref GB-PRO-0920-00028).
  • The ad showed an older woman and stated: “Are you up to date with your osteoporosis treatment? Winter is coming. Maintain your independence, call your GP, get your flu jab alongside your osteoporosis medicine”.
  • “Supported by Amgen” appeared prominently at the bottom with the company name in logo-type.
  • The complainant alleged (i) promotion of an Amgen osteoporosis treatment to the public and (ii) that the ad incorrectly suggested patients could access a flu vaccination with an Amgen treatment; they cited a patient query about switching treatment to receive a flu jab.
  • Amgen said it was a time-bound disease awareness campaign during Covid-19 to encourage patients to stay up to date with osteoporosis reviews and to use the flu vaccination visit as an opportunity to discuss osteoporosis with their GP.
  • The ad ran in five newspapers/magazines between 6 and 27 October 2020.
⚖️

Outcome

  • No breach of Clause 26.1: the ad did not refer directly or indirectly to a specific Amgen medicine and was not POM advertising to the public.
  • No breach of Clause 26.2: it might prompt discussion about osteoporosis treatment or flu vaccination generally, but not about prescribing a specific medicine.
  • Breach of Clause 9.1: the wording could be read as implying patients seeing their GP about osteoporosis medicine would also be able to receive a flu vaccination at the same time, which was not necessarily so; therefore misleading and not high standards.
  • No breach of Clause 9.1 in relation to the specific allegation that the ad implied the flu vaccine was an Amgen medicine.
  • No breach of Clause 2: Panel did not consider the circumstances warranted Clause 2 censure.
  • No appeal.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

⭐ Business Intelligence Access

See the full compliance picture for every pharma company

291 Company Intelligence Reports — breach patterns, appeal history, industry ranking, PDF export.

Request Access →
⭐ Flagship Programme

AQP Flagship Path — the complete UK ABPI signatory programme

12 modules. 12 weeks. Final Signatory readiness. The industry standard for ABPI Code signatories — £995 + VAT.

Enrol — AQP Path Learn more

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free
🎓 AQP Training