Consilient app preview on Google Play ruled public advertising of POM (InVita D3)

📅 2019 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

CaseAUTH/3403/10/20
CompanyConsilient Health Ltd
ComplainantMember of the public
ProductInVita D3 (colecalciferol)
ChannelGoogle Play Store app listing and downloadable app (“Vitamin D Vitality”)
Main issuePromotional information for a POM visible to the public before download (including reference to use in vitamin D deficiency and part of prescribing information)
App store category noted“Health and Fitness” (Google Play Store)
Complaint received21 October 2020
Case completed12 April 2021
Applicable Code year2019
No breachClause 4.1
BreachClauses 2, 9.1, 14.5, 26.1
SanctionsUndertaking received; Advertisement
AppealNo appeal

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
🎬 Expert Video Walkthrough
🎬
Video walkthrough — coming for members
Subscribe now and get expert video analysis for every case as we publish them.
Subscribe — from £299/yr
📋

What happened

  • A member of the public found Consilient’s “Vitamin D Vitality” app on the Google Play Store when searching for “vitamin D”.
  • The complainant alleged the app promoted InVita D3 (colecalciferol) and that branded content and prescribing information were visible in preview images (screenshots) even without downloading the app.
  • The app was described as intended to help HCPs who had already decided to prescribe InVita D3 select the appropriate product and dose (via an algorithm based on patient factors such as age, prophylaxis vs treatment, dosing frequency).
  • The app appeared in the Google Play Store under the category “Health and Fitness” (not “Medical”), which the Panel considered could imply suitability for the public; Consilient was held responsible for third parties acting on its behalf (including categorisation by developers).
  • The Panel considered that, although the Code did not specifically refer to apps, the internet promotion principles applied to Google Play Store listings and downloadable apps.
  • Consilient’s job bag for the app (UK/INV/1116/0038) was first certified on 12 September 2017 and re-certified on 17 September 2019; the Panel found there was a delay beyond the two-year recertification requirement.
⚖️

Outcome

  • Breach found: a prescription only medicine (InVita D3) was advertised to the public because promotional information was visible before download on Google Play Store.
  • No breach found: Clause 4.1 (prescribing information) — the Panel accepted the prescribing information was current and the 2019 SPC update did not affect it.
  • Breach found: Clause 14.5 — delay in re-certifying the app beyond the required interval.
  • Breach found: Clause 9.1 — failure to maintain high standards.
  • Breach found: Clause 2 — conduct brought discredit upon and reduced confidence in the industry (lack of care/awareness on matters reflecting UK law).
  • No appeal.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

⭐ Business Intelligence Access

See the full compliance picture for every pharma company

291 Company Intelligence Reports — breach patterns, appeal history, industry ranking, PDF export.

Request Access →
⭐ Flagship Programme

AQP Flagship Path — the complete UK ABPI signatory programme

12 modules. 12 weeks. Final Signatory readiness. The industry standard for ABPI Code signatories — £995 + VAT.

Enrol — AQP Path Learn more

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free
🎓 AQP Training