GSK voluntary admission: Avamys digital banners had illegible non-proprietary name (AUTH/3341/5/20)

📅 2020 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

CaseAUTH/3341/5/20
CompanyGlaxoSmithKline UK Limited
ProductAvamys (fluticasone furoate nasal spray)
IssueNon-proprietary name not readily readable in HTML files; not adjacent at first brand name appearance in online banner ads
Material typeDynamic digital banner advertisements (multiple sizes; rotating frames; some scrolling text)
ReferencesPM-GB-FLF-BNNR-190001; PM-GB-FLF-BNNR-190002 (related banner in prior case: PM-GB-FLF-BNNR-190003)
Where placedMedscape UK, Doctors.net.uk, GP Notebook; later Pulse, RCNi, GP Online, Medscape UK
Key process gapHTML file not reviewed by final signatory as required by company procedure
Applicable Code year2019
Complaint received01 May 2020
Completed10 July 2020
Breach clausesClause 4.3; Clause 9.1
SanctionsUndertaking received
AppealNo appeal

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
🎬 Expert Video Walkthrough
🎬
Video walkthrough — coming for members
Subscribe now and get expert video analysis for every case as we publish them.
Subscribe — from £299/yr
📋

What happened

  • During a separate complaint (Case AUTH/3328/4/20), GlaxoSmithKline UK Limited (GSK) reviewed 11 Avamys banner ads approved for UK use in 2019/20 and found two additional online banner advertisements with similar issues (refs PM-GB-FLF-BNNR-190001 and PM-GB-FLF-BNNR-190002).
  • The issue: in the HTML files within the job bags, the non-proprietary name (fluticasone furoate) was small and difficult to read.
  • Although the non-proprietary name appeared under the brand name in the logo, it was not positioned at the first appearance of the brand name on the banners.
  • The final form PDFs were said to show the non-proprietary name as present and legible, but the HTML versions (the live digital assets) did not.
  • The HTML files for both banners had not been reviewed by the final signatory as required by GSK procedure.
  • The banners ran online (including Medscape UK, Doctors.net.uk, GP Notebook; later Pulse, RCNi, GP Online and Medscape UK) across periods in 2019 and 2020.
  • GSK withdrew the materials and placed the 2020 Avamys digital campaign on hold.
⚖️

Outcome

  • Breach of Clause 4.3 was ruled (as acknowledged by GSK).
  • Breach of Clause 9.1 was ruled (as acknowledged by GSK).
  • No appeal.
  • Case completed 10 July 2020.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

⭐ Business Intelligence Access

See the full compliance picture for every pharma company

291 Company Intelligence Reports — breach patterns, appeal history, industry ranking, PDF export.

Request Access →
⭐ Flagship Programme

AQP Flagship Path — the complete UK ABPI signatory programme

12 modules. 12 weeks. Final Signatory readiness. The industry standard for ABPI Code signatories — £995 + VAT.

Enrol — AQP Path Learn more

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free
🎓 AQP Training