Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer: Eliquis prescribing information in promotional email (AUTH/3289/12/19 & AUTH/3290/12/19)

📅 2019 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

Case numbersAUTH/3289/12/19 and AUTH/3290/12/19
CompanyBristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer (BMS/Pfizer Alliance)
ProductEliquis (apixaban)
MaterialPrescribing information attached to a promotional email
ComplainantConcerned UK health professional
IssuePI revised July 2019; SPC updated Oct 2019 (reversal agent availability; overdose management). PI did not reference antidote/overdose and placed “see SPC” signpost later in text.
Complaint received17 December 2019
Case completed21 and 25 August 2020
Applicable Code year2019
Breach findingsClause 9.1 (breach); Clauses 2 and 4.1 (no breach)
SanctionsUndertaking received; additional sanctions: Not stated
AppealNo appeal

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
🎬 Expert Video Walkthrough
🎬
Video walkthrough — coming for members
Subscribe now and get expert video analysis for every case as we publish them.
Subscribe — from £299/yr
📋

What happened

  • A UK health professional complained about prescribing information (PI) attached to a promotional email for Eliquis (apixaban) received in December 2019.
  • The PI was last revised in July 2019, while the Eliquis SPC had been updated in October 2019.
  • The October 2019 SPC update added information on the availability of an agent to reverse Eliquis’ anticoagulant activity (SPC Section 4.4) and added reversal-agent wording to overdose management (SPC Section 4.9).
  • The PI included a ‘Haemorrhage risk’ paragraph and, later (after several paragraphs), a statement: “For information on reversal and managing bleeding, see SPC for further details”.
  • The PI did not explicitly reference an antidote/reversal agent and did not reference overdose.
  • The Alliance stated it had robust processes for SPC updates and concluded no PI change was needed in October 2019 because the PI already directed readers to the SPC for reversal/bleeding management.
⚖️

Outcome

  • No breach of Clause 4.1.
  • Breach of Clause 9.1.
  • No breach of Clause 2.
  • No appeal.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

⭐ Business Intelligence Access

See the full compliance picture for every pharma company

291 Company Intelligence Reports — breach patterns, appeal history, industry ranking, PDF export.

Request Access →
⭐ Flagship Programme

AQP Flagship Path — the complete UK ABPI signatory programme

12 modules. 12 weeks. Final Signatory readiness. The industry standard for ABPI Code signatories — £995 + VAT.

Enrol — AQP Path Learn more

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free
🎓 AQP Training