ViiV Healthcare breached Clause 28.1 after HCP website landing page did not clearly steer patients/public away from promotional content

📅 2019 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

CaseAUTH/3272/10/19
CompanyViiV Healthcare
MaterialCompany website (ViiV Exchange: uk.viivexchange.com)
Complaint received25 October 2019
Case completed05 October 2020
Applicable Code year2019
AppealNo appeal
Breach clauses28.1
Key issueLanding page aimed at HCPs; patient/public tabs were not sufficiently prominent; no pop-up/clear prompt; patients/public likely to access POM promotional material
SanctionsUndertaking received; additional sanctions: Not stated

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
🎬 Expert Video Walkthrough
🎬
Video walkthrough — coming for members
Subscribe now and get expert video analysis for every case as we publish them.
Subscribe — from £299/yr
📋

What happened

  • A UK health professional complained about ViiV’s website “ViiV Exchange” (uk.viivexchange.com).
  • The complaint alleged there was nothing to delineate between the general public, patients and health professionals before entering the site, potentially encouraging patients/public to use HCP-only resources.
  • Visitors landed on a page aimed at healthcare professionals, with small, less prominent tabs (“I am a patient” and “Public site”) in the top right.
  • No pop-up or similar prompt guided patients/public to the correct pathway off the HCP-focused landing page.
  • The Panel considered that if patients/public proceeded, they would access promotional material for prescription only medicines.
⚖️

Outcome

  • Breach ruled: the format and presentation meant patients/public were likely (on the balance of probabilities) to access promotional material and were not encouraged towards material aimed at them.
  • ViiV’s argument that access restriction was not mandated did not prevent a breach finding where separation/identification was not sufficiently clear in practice.
  • No appeal.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

⭐ Business Intelligence Access

See the full compliance picture for every pharma company

291 Company Intelligence Reports — breach patterns, appeal history, industry ranking, PDF export.

Request Access →
⭐ Flagship Programme

AQP Flagship Path — the complete UK ABPI signatory programme

12 modules. 12 weeks. Final Signatory readiness. The industry standard for ABPI Code signatories — £995 + VAT.

Enrol — AQP Path Learn more

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free
🎓 AQP Training