AUTH/3207/6/19: Anonymous v Santen (RCOphth congress conduct and symposium hospitality) – No breach

📅 2019 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

Case numberAUTH/3207/6/19
PartiesAnonymous complainant v Santen UK Limited
Complaint themeConduct of employees; congress/symposium conduct; hospitality; speaker arrangements
Event(s)Royal College of Ophthalmologists (RCOphth) annual meeting 2019; Santen-organised symposium
Products/areas mentionedPrescription-only eye drops (including glaucoma); Ikervis (prescribing information included in symposium booklet); Microshunt (glaucoma medical device; rights acquired by Santen)
Hospitality cost£46.71 per person (pre-event drinks £5.07; dinner and drinks £41.64)
Water at standBranded bottled water; £1.30 per bottle; 500 available; single-use recyclable
AttendeesOver 60 HCPs attended symposium (63 stated); ~20 Santen employees attended (UK and EMEA)
Alleged issuesInducement/pressure to leave poster session; interruption of judges; hospitality as incentive; irrelevance of content; promotion of acquired/other-company products; high speaker payment and business class travel
Applicable Code year2019
Clauses consideredClause 2; Clause 9.1; Clause 11.1; Clause 18.1; Clause 22.1; Clause 23.1
Panel decisionNo breach of the Code
Complaint received19 June 2019
Case completed15 November 2019
AppealNo appeal

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
🎬 Expert Video Walkthrough
🎬
Video walkthrough — coming for members
Subscribe now and get expert video analysis for every case as we publish them.
Subscribe — from £299/yr
📋

What happened

  • An anonymous, non-contactable complainant (described as a concerned physician) complained about Santen UK employees’ conduct at the 2019 Royal College of Ophthalmologists (RCOphth) meeting and a Santen-organised symposium.
  • Allegations included Santen staff asking delegates to leave a poster session to attend the Santen meeting at another venue, including allegedly interrupting poster judges.
  • The complainant alleged a senior employee encouraged attendance by offering “wine and dinner”.
  • The complainant received a branded bottle of water from the Santen exhibition stand and considered it confusing/inappropriate (including environmental concerns about plastic).
  • The complainant said the symposium ran late; wine was available earlier and food only at the end; and that some sessions were irrelevant to their practice.
  • The complainant queried what Santen was promoting and whether it was promoting products it had acquired (including Microshunt, a glaucoma medical device) and/or other companies’ products.
  • The complainant alleged the Microshunt speaker said they were paid “a lot of money” and flown business class, and questioned why a UK speaker was not used.
⚖️

Outcome

  • No breach of the Code was found.
  • The Panel considered providing bottled water from an exhibition stand was not unreasonable and did not constitute a prohibited gift on the facts presented.
  • The Panel considered the hospitality cost for the symposium (£46.71 per person) was not unreasonable and not out of line with what recipients would normally adopt when paying for themselves.
  • The Panel found the complainant did not provide evidence to support allegations about employee conduct/inducement at the poster session and therefore did not discharge the burden of proof.
  • The Panel accepted that using a US speaker with relevant Microshunt experience was not necessarily a breach; business class travel for intercontinental travel was not a breach; and the arrangements were not shown to be in breach.
  • The Panel found no evidence that Santen promoted another company’s medicines or failed to maintain high standards.
  • The Panel considered the meeting content was tailored to the audience and ruled no breach regarding meeting content.
  • No breach of Clause 2 (discredit/reduced confidence) was ruled.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

⭐ Business Intelligence Access

See the full compliance picture for every pharma company

291 Company Intelligence Reports — breach patterns, appeal history, industry ranking, PDF export.

Request Access →
⭐ Flagship Programme

AQP Flagship Path — the complete UK ABPI signatory programme

12 modules. 12 weeks. Final Signatory readiness. The industry standard for ABPI Code signatories — £995 + VAT.

Enrol — AQP Path Learn more

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free
🎓 AQP Training