AUTH/3024/3/18: Anonymous hospital consultant v GW Pharmaceuticals (Epidiolex) – no breach (unsolicited request exemption)

📅 2018 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

CaseAUTH/3024/3/18
ComplainantAnonymous, non-contactable hospital consultant (described as consultant neurologist)
CompanyGW Pharmaceuticals
Medicine / subjectEpidiolex (cannabidiol); referred to as cannabidiol/CBD in company materials
AllegationPre-licence promotion at a hospital meeting (February 2018)
Regulatory status at timeMarketing authorisation application submitted to EMA on 29 December 2017; unlicensed in EU at time of meeting
Meeting contextHospital departmental/MDT meeting; request said to have been made by two health professionals in December 2017
Key evidence issueDifferent slide sets: complainant photos (9 slides) vs company deck (32 slides) with prominent “investigational/not licensed” wording
Panel decisionNo breach (company could rely on Clause 1.2 unsolicited request exemption on balance of probabilities)
Clauses considered2, 9.1, 3.1, 15.2, 15.9 (and Clause 1.2 referenced)
Complaint received12 March 2018
Case completed18 October 2018
AppealNo appeal
Applicable Code year2016

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
🎬 Expert Video Walkthrough
🎬
Video walkthrough — coming for members
Subscribe now and get expert video analysis for every case as we publish them.
Subscribe — from £299/yr
📋

What happened

  • An anonymous, non-contactable complainant (described as a consultant neurologist) alleged pre-licence promotion of Epidiolex (cannabidiol) at a hospital multi-disciplinary team meeting in February 2018.
  • At the time, a marketing authorisation application had been submitted to the EMA (29 December 2017) for adjunctive treatment of seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome and Dravet Syndrome.
  • The complainant provided photographs of nine slides and said they were later told the product was not licensed/available to prescribe in the UK/Europe.
  • GW Pharmaceuticals said the meeting was held in response to an unsolicited request from two health professionals (made verbally in December 2017) for an update on clinical data and properties of cannabidiol, and that the content was scientific/medical, not promotional.
  • A third-party organisation employed managers who represented GW Pharmaceuticals; the Panel noted GW was responsible for third parties acting on its behalf.
  • There was a dispute about which slide deck was used: the complainant’s photos lacked licensing warnings; GW’s 32-slide deck included prominent “investigational/not licensed” wording on many slides and a disclaimer slide stating it was not FDA/EMA approved.
  • The Panel noted concerns about the meeting (including lack of formal documentation) and observed the slides included proposed indications, usage and dosage, which could make HCPs view it as a pre-licence product.
  • However, GW provided evidence supporting an unsolicited request (emails, contemporaneous notes, attendee list, statements, and a signed transcript/record of a call with a requesting health professional).
⚖️

Outcome

  • No breach of Clause 3.1 (promotion prior to marketing authorisation) on the particular facts, because GW could rely on the unsolicited request exemption.
  • Consequently, no breach of Clauses 15.2, 9.1 and 2.
  • No breach of Clause 15.9 (Panel did not consider the allegation raised a Clause 15.9 matter).
  • No appeal.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

⭐ Business Intelligence Access

See the full compliance picture for every pharma company

291 Company Intelligence Reports — breach patterns, appeal history, industry ranking, PDF export.

Request Access →
⭐ Flagship Programme

AQP Flagship Path — the complete UK ABPI signatory programme

12 modules. 12 weeks. Final Signatory readiness. The industry standard for ABPI Code signatories — £995 + VAT.

Enrol — AQP Path Learn more

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free
🎓 AQP Training