AUTH/3016/1/18: Consultant Haematologist v Takeda (Alleged religious discrimination) – No breach / Out of scope | PMCPA Case

📊

Key facts

⌄

Case number	AUTH/3016/1/18
Complainant	Consultant Haematologist
Company	Takeda
Allegation	Religious discrimination
Complaint received	29 January 2018
Completed	12 July 2018
Applicable Code year	2016
Decision	No breach; outwith the scope of the Code
Clauses cited	Not stated
Sanctions	Not stated

Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI

🎬 Expert Video Walkthrough

🎬

Video walkthrough — coming for members

Subscribe now and get expert video analysis for every case as we publish them.

Subscribe — from £299/yr

📋

⌄

A consultant haematologist made a complaint against Takeda.
The allegation related to religious discrimination.
The case was considered under the ABPI Code of Practice (Applicable Code year: 2016).

⚖️

⌄

No breach.
The matter was found to be outwith the scope of the Code (i.e., outside what the ABPI Code/PMCPA process covers).

🔒

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value

£249/year

Annual — save £99

£29/mo

Monthly

Join Now — Instant Access

⭐ Business Intelligence Access

See the full compliance picture for every pharma company

291 Company Intelligence Reports — breach patterns, appeal history, industry ranking, PDF export.

Request Access →