AUTH/3000/12/17: Director v Roche (Gazyvaro) – Clinical trial disclosure

📅 2017 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

Case numberAUTH/3000/12/17
PartiesDirector v Roche
ProductGazyvaro
IssueClinical trial disclosure
Complaint received20 December 2017
Completed06 March 2018
Applicable Code year2016
DecisionNo breach; outwith the scope of the Code; no report; out of scope
Clauses citedNot stated
SanctionsNot stated
Sourcehttps://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/completed-cases/auth30001217-director-v-roche

Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
🎬 Expert Video Walkthrough
🎬
Video walkthrough — coming for members
Subscribe now and get expert video analysis for every case as we publish them.
Subscribe — from £299/yr
📋

What happened

  • A case was brought by the PMCPA Director against Roche.
  • The subject matter related to clinical trial disclosure for Gazyvaro.
  • The case was assessed under the 2016 ABPI Code of Practice.
⚖️

Outcome

  • No breach.
  • Outwith the scope of the Code.
  • No report.
  • Out of scope.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

⭐ Business Intelligence Access

See the full compliance picture for every pharma company

291 Company Intelligence Reports — breach patterns, appeal history, industry ranking, PDF export.

Request Access →
⭐ Flagship Programme

AQP Flagship Path — the complete UK ABPI signatory programme

12 modules. 12 weeks. Final Signatory readiness. The industry standard for ABPI Code signatories — £995 + VAT.

Enrol — AQP Path Learn more

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free
🎓 AQP Training