PMCPA Case
| Case | AUTH/2723/7/14 |
| Parties | Clinician v Napp Pharmaceuticals Limited |
| Medicine | BuTrans (buprenorphine transdermal patch) |
| Materials | BMJ advertisement (UK/BUTR-13054b); website page (UK/BUTR-12036); detail aid (UK/BUTR-13057) |
| Therapy area / theme | Pain management in dementia; agitation/aggression as possible pain indicators |
| Key issue | Promotion implied robust evidence for BuTrans analgesic efficacy in dementia and implied reduced antipsychotic use; evidence base not sufficiently robust and claims not substantiated |
| Applicable Code year | 2014 |
| Complaint received | 23 July 2014 |
| Case completed | 7 November 2014 |
| Appeal | Appealed by both respondent and complainant; Panel report to Appeal Board |
| Breach clauses | Clause 7.2 (x2) and 7.4 (x2) |
| No breach | Clause 7.2 (BMJ advertisement on narrow allegation re agitation) |
| Sanctions (per case page) | Undertaking received; Recovery of items; Additional sanctions: none |
Download the full case report (PDF)
Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory
Got a question about this case?
Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.
⭐ Business Intelligence Access
See the full compliance picture for every pharma company
291 Company Intelligence Reports — breach patterns, appeal history, industry ranking, PDF export.
One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.