AUTH/2700/2/14: Nurse v Novartis — Gilenya advertisement in a lay publication (out of scope; no breach) | PMCPA Case

📊

Key facts

⌄

Case number	AUTH/2700/2/14
Parties	Nurse v Novartis
Product	Gilenya
Issue	Advertisement in a lay publication
Complaint received	10 February 2014
Completed	21 March 2014
Applicable Code year	2012
Decision	No breach; outwith the scope of the Code
Case report	No case report (outwith scope)
Sanctions	None stated

Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI

🎬 Expert Video Walkthrough

🎬

Video walkthrough — coming for members

Subscribe now and get expert video analysis for every case as we publish them.

Subscribe — from £299/yr

📋

⌄

A nurse complained about a Gilenya advertisement appearing in a lay publication.
The complaint was received by the PMCPA on 10 February 2014.
The case was completed on 21 March 2014.
The PMCPA concluded the matter was outwith the scope of the ABPI Code (Applicable Code year: 2012).
No case report was issued because it was outwith scope.

⚖️

⌄

🔒

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value

£249/year

Annual — save £99

£29/mo

Monthly

Join Now — Instant Access

⭐ Business Intelligence Access

See the full compliance picture for every pharma company

291 Company Intelligence Reports — breach patterns, appeal history, industry ranking, PDF export.

Request Access →