AUTH/2660/11/13: Member of the public v HRA Pharma (ellaOne) – outwith scope, no breach | PMCPA Case

📊

Key facts

⌄

Case number	AUTH/2660/11/13
Parties	Member of the public v HRA Pharma
Issue	Clinical trial disclosure (ellaOne)
Complaint received	18 November 2013
Completed	20 March 2014
Applicable Code year	2012
Outcome	No breach; outwith the scope of the Code
Review	No Review as outwith the scope of the Code
Clauses cited	No breach, outwith the scope of the Code
Sanctions	Not stated

Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI

🎬 Expert Video Walkthrough

🎬

Video walkthrough — coming for members

Subscribe now and get expert video analysis for every case as we publish them.

Subscribe — from £299/yr

📋

⌄

A member of the public made a complaint about clinical trial disclosure relating to ellaOne.
The complaint was considered under the ABPI Code of Practice (Applicable Code year: 2012).
The PMCPA concluded the matter was outwith the scope of the Code.

⚖️

⌄

No breach.
No case report was produced because the matter was outwith the scope of the Code.
No review (recorded as: “No Review as outwith the scope of the Code”).

🔒

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value

£249/year

Annual — save £99

£29/mo

Monthly

Join Now — Instant Access