Bayer: late-night hotel bar drinks at ISTH congress ruled not “subsistence” (breach Clause 19.1)

📅 2012 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

CaseAUTH/2621/7/13
PartiesAnonymous complainant v Bayer plc
IssueProvision of hospitality (late-night hotel bar drinks)
EventISTH Congress, Amsterdam (29 June – 4 July 2013)
Key alleged conductEntertaining in hotel bar in early hours; appearance of significant alcohol consumption
Bayer accountAfter BHAP awards dinner (1 July), group waited for taxi; 4 drinks purchased near midnight for £28.15
Evidence limitationsComplainant non-contactable; hotel invoice not itemised; Panel did not know drink types
Applicable Code year2012
BreachClause 19.1
No breachClause 9.1
SanctionsUndertaking received; additional sanctions not stated
Complaint received26 July 2013
Case completed30 August 2013
AppealNo appeal

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
🎬 Expert Video Walkthrough
🎬
Video walkthrough — coming for members
Subscribe now and get expert video analysis for every case as we publish them.
Subscribe — from £299/yr
📋

What happened

  • An anonymous, non-contactable health professional complained about hospitality provided by Bayer plc at the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Congress in Amsterdam (29 June – 4 July 2013).
  • The complainant alleged a senior Bayer employee entertained two consultant colleagues in a hotel bar in the early hours and it looked as though significant amounts of alcohol were being consumed.
  • Bayer explained that after a Bayer Haemophilia Awards Programme (BHAP) awards dinner on 1 July, three UK health professionals walked a senior Bayer UK employee back to her hotel (safety/nearest taxi rank outside her hotel).
  • With no taxis available, the group waited in the hotel lobby bar and four drinks were purchased (one each) at a cost of £28.15 just before midnight.
  • The hotel did not provide itemised invoices; Bayer provided an expense claim and a hotel invoice showing a single total for food and beverage that day (€114.50), which also included other drinks purchased earlier in the day.
  • Bayer’s SOP Meetings Policy (BHC-BP-UK-SOP-101) stated that drinks other than reasonable amounts of soft drinks, water, coffee and tea must not be provided after a meal.
⚖️

Outcome

  • Breach of Clause 19.1 (hospitality must be strictly limited to the main purpose of the event and be secondary—subsistence only).
  • No breach of Clause 9.1 (high standards) given the Panel considered the circumstances exceptional.
  • No appeal.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

⭐ Business Intelligence Access

See the full compliance picture for every pharma company

291 Company Intelligence Reports — breach patterns, appeal history, industry ranking, PDF export.

Request Access →
⭐ Flagship Programme

AQP Flagship Path — the complete UK ABPI signatory programme

12 modules. 12 weeks. Final Signatory readiness. The industry standard for ABPI Code signatories — £995 + VAT.

Enrol — AQP Path Learn more

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free
🎓 AQP Training