AUTH/2537/10/12: Anonymous v Bayer – Xarelto ad claim “one tablet, once daily, simple” (No breach)

📅 2012 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

Case numberAUTH/2537/10/12
ComplainantAnonymous, non-contactable
CompanyBayer HealthCare
MedicineXarelto (rivaroxaban)
MaterialTwo-page advertisement in GP (24 October 2012), ref L.GB.09.2012.0568h
Key claim at issue“one tablet, once daily, simple” (in relation to stroke prevention in AF)
Clauses considered2, 3.2, 7.2, 7.9, 9.1
DecisionNo breach of the Code
Complaint received29 October 2012
Case completed28 November 2012
Applicable Code year2012
AppealNo appeal

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
🎬 Expert Video Walkthrough
🎬
Video walkthrough — coming for members
Subscribe now and get expert video analysis for every case as we publish them.
Subscribe — from £299/yr
📋

What happened

  • An anonymous, non-contactable complainant challenged a two-page Bayer HealthCare advertisement for Xarelto (rivaroxaban) published in GP on 24 October 2012 (ref L.GB.09.2012.0568h).
  • The ad, in the context of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), included the phrase: “one tablet, once daily, simple”.
  • The complainant alleged the ad was “outrageous” because anticoagulants carry serious bleeding risks and require careful consideration and monitoring.
  • The complainant argued describing Xarelto as “simple” did not reflect the inherent risks of anticoagulants and was not supported by the prescribing information (including cautions/dose reductions in renal impairment and extensive contraindications/warnings/interactions).
  • The PMCPA asked Bayer to consider Clauses 2, 3.2, 7.2, 7.9 and 9.1.
  • Bayer responded that “simple” referred to the dosing regimen (once daily for key indications) and contrasted this with the complexity of warfarin management (INR monitoring, dose adjustments, multiple strengths, interactions).
⚖️

Outcome

  • No breach of the Code was ruled.
  • The Panel found “simple” was used to describe the dosing regimen within the phrase “one tablet, once daily, simple”, not a general claim that Xarelto was simple to use overall.
  • The Panel considered the claim was not inconsistent with the SPC and did not inaccurately reflect anticoagulant risks in context.
  • No breach was ruled for Clauses 2, 3.2, 7.2, 7.9 and 9.1.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

⭐ Business Intelligence Access

See the full compliance picture for every pharma company

291 Company Intelligence Reports — breach patterns, appeal history, industry ranking, PDF export.

Request Access →
⭐ Flagship Programme

AQP Flagship Path — the complete UK ABPI signatory programme

12 modules. 12 weeks. Final Signatory readiness. The industry standard for ABPI Code signatories — £995 + VAT.

Enrol — AQP Path Learn more

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free
🎓 AQP Training