AUTH/2286/12/09: General Practitioner v GlaxoSmithKline — Sponsorship of drug testing in sport (Out of scope; no breach) | PMCPA Case

📊

Key facts

⌄

Case number	AUTH/2286/12/09
Complainant	General Practitioner
Company	GlaxoSmithKline
Issue	Sponsorship of drug testing in sport
Complaint received	03 December 2009
Completed	18 February 2010
Appeal	No appeal
Review	No case report as outwith the scope of the Code
Breach	No breach, outwith the scope of the Code
Sanctions applied	Undertaking received
Additional sanctions	Not stated
Source	https://www.pmcpa.org.uk/cases/completed-cases/auth22861209-general-practitioner-v-glaxosmithkline

Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI

🎬 Expert Video Walkthrough

🎬

Video walkthrough — coming for members

Subscribe now and get expert video analysis for every case as we publish them.

Subscribe — from £299/yr

📋

⌄

A General Practitioner complained about GlaxoSmithKline.
The subject matter was sponsorship of drug testing in sport.
The PMCPA concluded the complaint was outwith the scope of the ABPI Code of Practice.

⚖️

⌄

🔒

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value

£249/year

Annual — save £99

£29/mo

Monthly

Join Now — Instant Access