AUTH/2172/10/08: Bayer Schering Pharma – pre-licence promotion of Xarelto via UK congress stand and JBJS supplement

📅 2008 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

Case numberAUTH/2172/10/08
PartiesBoehringer Ingelheim v Bayer Schering Pharma
ProductXarelto (rivaroxaban)
Comparator mentionedPradaxa (dabigatran)
Main issuePre-licence promotion; misleading/disparaging messaging; unacceptable promotional quiz/prize; inadequate sponsorship disclosure; misleading “currently available” graph
Key activitiesExhibition stand at Belfast meeting (June 2008); JBJS insert/supplement distributed in UK (September 2008)
UK marketing authorisation date (Xarelto)1 October 2008
Complaint received9 October 2008
Case completed23 December 2008
Applicable Code2006 (using 2008 Constitution and Procedure)
Breach clauses2, 3.1 (x2), 7.2 (x2), 7.3, 8.1, 9.10, 18.2
SanctionsUndertaking received; Advertisement
AppealNo appeal

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
🎬 Expert Video Walkthrough
🎬
Video walkthrough — coming for members
Subscribe now and get expert video analysis for every case as we publish them.
Subscribe — from £299/yr
📋

What happened

  • Boehringer Ingelheim complained that Bayer Schering Pharma promoted Xarelto (rivaroxaban) before it received a UK marketing authorisation (MA granted 1 October 2008).
  • At the Irish Orthopaedic Association meeting in Belfast (19–20 June 2008), Bayer Schering had a VTE-themed exhibition stand with panels including: “Great Clinical Need for New Anticoagulants Providing: effective anticoagulation; low risk of bleeding; oral delivery; wide therapeutic window; fixed dosing; no monitoring; low risk of food and drug interactions and predictable pharmacology”.
  • The stand was manned by sales representatives and marketing team members from the Republic of Ireland affiliate; the UK company said it only learned of the meeting after the event.
  • A leaflet/quiz card invited delegates to “Test your knowledge on VTE and enter a draw to win a book voucher”.
  • A supplement on rivaroxaban was distributed with the British Volume of the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (available 4 September 2008), before the UK MA. The Panel considered it a paid-for insert linked closely to Bayer Schering (not an arm’s length journal supplement), and not formally peer reviewed by JBJS.
  • The supplement’s front cover did not clearly acknowledge Bayer Schering’s sponsorship at the outset (disclosures within articles were not considered sufficient).
  • A graph titled “Efficacy of currently available options for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis” used older data (Geerts et al 2001) and did not include dabigatran, which was available in the UK at the time.
⚖️

Outcome

  • The exhibition panel at the Belfast meeting was ruled to be pre-licence promotion of Xarelto in a promotional exhibition context.
  • The “Great Clinical Need…” heading was ruled misleading and disparaging because it implied no anticoagulant was available with the listed attributes (when Pradaxa/dabigatran was already available), and the claimed broader “unmet need” context was not made clear on the panel.
  • The prize draw quiz was ruled an unacceptable promotional method.
  • The JBJS insert was ruled promotional and to have promoted Xarelto to UK health professionals prior to MA.
  • The “currently available options” graph was ruled misleading because it was not up-to-date and omitted dabigatran.
  • Failure to clearly state sponsorship on the front cover was ruled a breach.
  • Overall, repeated pre-licence promotion and poor control (including overseas affiliate activity in the UK) brought the industry into disrepute.
  • No breach was ruled for certain wording allegations (eg, “An introduction to rivaroxaban…” implying availability; and some “offers/will offer” statements being misleading/exaggerated), though the Panel noted that where such statements promoted Xarelto, this was covered by the Clause 3.1 breach.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

⭐ Business Intelligence Access

See the full compliance picture for every pharma company

291 Company Intelligence Reports — breach patterns, appeal history, industry ranking, PDF export.

Request Access →
⭐ Flagship Programme

AQP Flagship Path — the complete UK ABPI signatory programme

12 modules. 12 weeks. Final Signatory readiness. The industry standard for ABPI Code signatories — £995 + VAT.

Enrol — AQP Path Learn more

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free
🎓 AQP Training