PMCPA Case
| Case | AUTH/1882/8/06 |
| Complainant | General practitioner |
| Company | Sanofi-Aventis |
| Product | Acomplia (rimonabant) |
| Material | Detachable page tag attached to a full-page MIMS advertisement |
| Main issue | Tag showed brand name only; lacked approved (non-proprietary) name and (as ruled) required prescribing information |
| Panel finding | Tag was an advertisement and had to stand alone; could not rely on PI in the adjacent advertisement |
| Breach clauses | Clause 4.1 and Clause 4.3 |
| Sanctions | Undertaking received |
| Complaint received | 09 August 2006 (site) / 10 August 2006 (report) |
| Case completed | 25 September 2006 (site) / 26 September 2006 (report) |
| Appeal | No appeal |
| Applicable Code year | 2006 |
Download the full case report (PDF)
Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory
Got a question about this case?
Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.
⭐ Business Intelligence Access
See the full compliance picture for every pharma company
291 Company Intelligence Reports — breach patterns, appeal history, industry ranking, PDF export.
One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.