Boehringer Ingelheim: Jardiance slide deck left accessible beyond recertification and PI link failed (AUTH/3906/5/24)

📅 8 March 2026 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

Case numberAUTH/3906/5/24
CompanyBoehringer Ingelheim Limited
ProductJardiance (empagliflozin)
MaterialCase study presentation slide deck: “Weight and type 2 diabetes”
ChannelBoehringer promotional website / CMS-hosted asset accessible via URL
AudiencePrimary care health professionals
Main issuesRecertification beyond 2 years; PI not accessible via direct single click; reviewer comments visible; alleged lack of context for comparative table (not upheld)
Applicable Code year2021
Breach clausesClause 5.1 (x2), Clause 8.5, Clause 12.1, Clause 12.4
No breach clausesClause 2, Clause 6.1, Clause 6.2, Clause 8.1
Complaint received16 May 2024
Case completed6 June 2025
AppealNo appeal
SanctionsUndertaking received; Additional sanctions: Not stated

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
📋

What happened

  • An anonymous complainant found a Jardiance (empagliflozin) case-study slide deck (“Weight and type 2 diabetes”) accessible via a URL on a Boehringer promotional website.
  • The deck appeared to have been prepared/certified in January 2021 and, in the complainant’s view, had not been updated/recertified within the required 2-year period.
  • The deck contained visible reviewer comments (eg, “note to reviewers”), suggesting a draft or non-final version was accessible.
  • The prescribing information (PI) was not included in the deck and the PI hyperlink was not a direct, single-click route when accessed by the complainant.
  • The complainant also challenged a slide/table about the impact of diabetes medicines on weight as lacking sufficient context (study design/endpoints) to interpret meaningfully.
  • Boehringer said the deck was certified 27 Jan 2021 and intended to be retired 1 July 2021; due to human error and technical issues it was not manually withdrawn from the CMS and the URL was not deactivated when the webpage was decommissioned, leaving it accessible until 21 May 2024.
  • Boehringer said the PI link worked until July 2022, but later PI housing changes meant the link no longer worked when the complainant accessed it.
⚖️

Outcome

  • Breach of Clause 5.1 (x2) Failing to maintain high standards.
  • Breach of Clause 8.5 Using material for more than two years without re-certification.
  • Breach of Clause 12.1 Failing to include up-to-date prescribing information.
  • Breach of Clause 12.4 Failing to include prescribing information within the digital material or via a direct, single click link.
  • No breach of Clause 2 Requirement that activities or materials must not bring discredit upon, or reduce confidence in, the pharmaceutical industry.
  • No breach of Clause 6.1 Requirement that information must be accurate, up-to-date and not misleading.
  • No breach of Clause 6.2 Requirement that information must be capable of substantiation.
  • No breach of Clause 8.1 Requirement to certify promotional material.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free