Roche: healthcare partnership website sponsorship declaration held sufficiently clear from the outset (AUTH/3893/4/24)

📅 8 March 2026 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

Case numberAUTH/3893/4/24
ComplainantAnonymous complainant; taken up in the name of the Chief Executive (PMCPA)
CompanyRoche
IssueAlleged lack of declaration of Roche sponsorship “from the outset” on a healthcare partnership website; alleged breach of undertaking from prior case AUTH/3676/7/22
MaterialWebsite (Date of Preparation: December 2023; Material Number: M-GB-00013651)
Applicable Code2021
Clauses considered2, 3.3, 5.1, 25.3
OutcomeNo breach of Clauses 2, 3.3, 5.1, 25.3
Complaint received29 April 2024
Case completed11 June 2025
AppealNo appeal
Additional sanctionsNot stated

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
📋

What happened

  • An anonymous, contactable complainant alleged a healthcare partnership website did not prominently declare Roche sponsorship “from the outset”, with the declaration only appearing at the end of the webpage.
  • The complainant further alleged this repeated an earlier issue and therefore breached an undertaking given in a previous case (AUTH/3676/7/22).
  • The material referenced was a website (Date of Preparation: December 2023; Material Number: M-GB-00013651) for a coalition/partnership involving multiple organisations and Roche.
  • Roche stated it sponsored the initiative by funding a medical communications company to act as secretariat, and that campaign materials were subject to Roche approval for ABPI Code compliance; a Roche Medical Final Signatory certified the website in December 2023.
  • Roche initiated a recall process for the material while the complaint was investigated.
  • The Panel reviewed screenshots taken at the time of complaint receipt (complainant provided no screenshots). The homepage showed small partner logos (including Roche) at the top, a video thumbnail referencing Roche in the first field of vision, and a fuller funding declaration after scrolling down.
⚖️

Outcome

  • No breach of Clause 25.3.
  • No breach of Clause 3.3.
  • No breach of Clause 5.1.
  • No breach of Clause 2.
  • No appeal.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free