Moderna: unapproved WhatsApp trial recruitment message offered £1,500 to children (AUTH/3886/3/24)

📅 2024 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

FieldDetails
Case numberAUTH/3886/3/24
ComplainantChildren’s Covid Vaccines Advisory Council (CCVAC) (complaint on behalf of)
CompanyModerna Biotech UK Ltd
Product / activityNextCOVE COVID booster vaccine clinical trial recruitment
ChannelWhatsApp message (social media/messaging)
Key allegationRecruitment of children using an unapproved financial incentive (£1,500 on completion)
Applicable Code year2021
Complaint received2 March 2024
Case completed6 August 2024
AppealNo appeal
Breach findingsClause 5.1; Clause 2
No breach findingsClause 3.4
SanctionsUndertaking received; Advertisement

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
📋

What happened

  • A complaint (on behalf of Children’s Covid Vaccines Advisory Council) alleged an inappropriate financial inducement was used to recruit children into Moderna’s NextCOVE COVID booster vaccine clinical trial.
  • A paediatrician at a contracted NHS trust trial site sent a WhatsApp message (from a personal phone) recruiting “children aged 12–18 years” and stating: “What’s in it for them? £1500 on completion of the study.”
  • The £1,500 figure appeared to come from an early version of the Parent Information Sheet/Informed Consent Form (PIS-ICF) that was later changed following ethics committee feedback; Moderna said the approved approach limited compensation to reimbursement of expenses and removed the amount from the PIS-ICF.
  • Moderna said it was unaware of the WhatsApp message until January 2024; it met with the site and initiated a Quality Event to investigate the inappropriate use of non-ethics-committee-approved documentation.
  • The Panel considered the sponsor’s process for distributing documents in “Local Information Packs” (pre-approval) confusing and prone to version-control errors, and noted the documents did not clearly indicate they were drafts subject to substantive change.
  • The Panel applied third-party responsibility (Clause 1.24) and held Moderna responsible under the Code for the message sent by an employee of a contracted third party (the NHS trust).
⚖️

Outcome

  • Breach of Clause 5.1 (Failing to maintain high standards).
  • Breach of Clause 2 (Bringing discredit upon, and reducing confidence in, the pharmaceutical industry).
  • No breach of Clause 3.4 (Requirement that companies must comply with all applicable codes, laws and regulations to which they are subject).
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

⭐ Charter Member — Until 31 March

See the full compliance picture for every pharma company

291 Company Intelligence Reports — breach patterns, appeal history, industry ranking, PDF export. £1,999/year £2,499

Get Charter Access →

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free