AUTH/3875/02/24: LinkedIn post mentioning Arexvy in financial results video (No breach)

📅 8 March 2026 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

Case numberAUTH/3875/02/24
CompanyGlaxoSmithKline (GSK)
ComplainantAnonymous, non-contactable
MaterialLinkedIn post with 52-second video by a GSK global leader
Medicine mentionedArexvy
Core issueWhether naming a POM in a publicly visible LinkedIn post amounted to advertising to the public / inappropriate public information
Applicable Code2021
Clauses considered2, 5.1, 26.1, 26.2
Panel decisionNo breach of Clauses 2, 5.1, 26.1, 26.2
Complaint received2 February 2024
Case completed26 September 2024
AppealNo appeal

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
📋

What happened

  • An anonymous, non-contactable complainant alleged a GSK global leader improperly mentioned a product name in a LinkedIn post visible to the public, amounting to promotion of a prescription-only medicine (POM).
  • The LinkedIn post (31 January 2024) accompanied GSK’s Q4 and full-year 2023 financial results and included a 52-second video.
  • In the video, the leader said: “GSK delivered excellent performance in 2023, with clear highlights, being the exceptional launch of Arexvy…”
  • “Arexvy” was mentioned once (about 7 seconds in). No indication, disease area, mode of action, or use was stated.
  • GSK argued the content was aimed at investors/media and was financial/corporate in nature, not product promotion; it also raised concerns about lack of intercompany dialogue (but the complainant was anonymous/uncontactable).
⚖️

Outcome

  • No breach of Clause 26.1.
  • No breach of Clause 26.2.
  • No breach of Clause 5.1.
  • No breach of Clause 2.
  • The Panel considered the post primarily promoted GSK’s financial performance, not a POM, and did not raise unfounded hopes or encourage the public to request prescribing.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

⭐ Charter Member — Until 31 March

See the full compliance picture for every pharma company

291 Company Intelligence Reports — breach patterns, appeal history, industry ranking, PDF export. £1,999/year £2,499

Get Charter Access →

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free