Novartis: employee ‘liked’ LinkedIn posts referencing Cosentyx and HS – promotion to the public (Clause 26.1 breach)

📅 8 March 2026 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

Case numbersAUTH/3843/11/23 and AUTH/3844/11/23
CompanyNovartis Pharmaceuticals UK Limited
IssueAlleged promotion of a medicine on LinkedIn via an employee ‘liking’ posts referencing Cosentyx (secukinumab) and HS
PlatformLinkedIn
MedicineCosentyx (secukinumab)
Indication referencedHidradenitis suppurativa (HS)
ComplainantAnonymous, non-contactable complainants
Applicable Code year2021
Complaint received02 November 2023
Case completed03 January 2025
AppealNo appeal
Breach findingsClause 26.1 (breach); Clause 5.1 (no breach)
SanctionsUndertaking received; additional sanctions not stated

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
📋

What happened

  • Two anonymous, non-contactable complaints were received and amalgamated.
  • A Novartis UK-based employee (in a global role; not apparently senior) ‘liked’ two LinkedIn posts that referenced Cosentyx (secukinumab) and its use/approval in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS).
  • Post 1 (from a US academic) included promotional phrasing such as “a win for HS patients” and “raises the bar”, and linked to an article about FDA approval of Cosentyx in HS.
  • Post 2 (from a pharma industry news outlet) stated FDA approval of an expanded label for #Cosentyx (secukinumab) in moderate-to-severe HS in adults, included an image of the Cosentyx injection, and linked to an article.
  • Novartis instructed the employee to ‘unlike’ both posts immediately on the day it received the PMCPA letters.
  • Novartis stated the employee acted without intent or instruction and contrary to company policies/training, but accepted the conduct was in scope of the Code and amounted to promotion to the public.
⚖️

Outcome

  • Breach of Clause 26.1 (Advertising a prescription only medicine to the public) in relation to each LinkedIn post.
  • No breach of Clause 5.1 (Requirement to maintain high standards) in relation to each LinkedIn post.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free