AUTH/3823/9/23: GSK LinkedIn ‘likes’ on US momelotinib approval posts – no breach (Clauses 12.1, 12.10, 26.1)

📅 8 March 2026 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

Case numberAUTH/3823/9/23
CompanyGSK
ComplaintAlleged promotion to the public and missing obligatory information from promotional posts on LinkedIn (“No PI or black triangle”).
ChannelLinkedIn (GSK corporate post and an employee post), linking to a GSK.com press release.
MedicineMomelotinib (Ojjaara)
UK authorisation status at the timeNot authorised in the UK (no UK marketing authorisation).
Key issue consideredWhether ‘likes’/engagement constituted promotion to the public and required PI/black triangle under Clauses 12.1/12.10, and whether Clause 26.1 applied.
Applicable Code2021
Clauses considered12.1, 12.10, 26.1
Panel decisionNo breach of Clauses 12.1, 12.10, 26.1
Complaint received18 September 2023
Case completed20 November 2024
AppealNo appeal

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
📋

What happened

  • An anonymous, non-contactable complainant alleged LinkedIn activity by GSK staff amounted to promotion to the public and lacked obligatory information (“No PI or black triangle”).
  • The LinkedIn activity related to posts about FDA approval in the USA of momelotinib (Ojjaara) for myelofibrosis patients with anaemia.
  • One post was from the GSK corporate LinkedIn account, linking to a press release on GSK.com labelled “For media and investors only”.
  • A second post was made by a Switzerland-based GSK employee about the approval, also linking to the same press release.
  • UK-based GSK employees ‘liked’ the posts; GSK accepted this brought the posts within the scope of the ABPI Code.
  • GSK contacted the UK employees and the ‘likes’ were removed (two on 18 September 2023; the third on 19 September 2023) and issued an internal reminder/briefing to the UK affiliate Oncology team (97 members) on appropriate social media engagement.
⚖️

Outcome

  • No breach of Clause 12.1 (Requirement to include up-to-date prescribing information).
  • No breach of Clause 12.10 (Requirement to include the black triangle in promotional material).
  • No breach of Clause 26.1 (Requirement not to advertise prescription only medicines to the public).
  • No appeal.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free