AstraZeneca: third-party “Sponsored” email linked to promotional microsite without naming sponsor or certifying final email (AUTH/3788/6/23)

📅 8 March 2026 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

CaseAUTH/3788/6/23
CompanyAstraZeneca UK Limited
ComplainantContactable complainant (health professional)
MaterialThird-party publisher email newsletter “SPONSORED” content block linking to “See Beyond Sugar” microsite
Product referenced on micrositeForxiga (dapagliflozin)
Main issueEmail did not name AstraZeneca and did not make clear the link led to promotional content; email advert not certified
Applicable Code year2021
Complaint received30 June 2023
Case completed23 July 2024
AppealNo appeal
Breach clausesClause 3.6; Clause 5.5; Clause 8.1
No breach clausesClause 5.1
SanctionsUndertaking received

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
📋

What happened

  • A health professional complained about the “SPONSORED” section of a third-party publisher’s email newsletter.
  • The sponsored content block read: “Sponsored: See Beyond Sugar: Using NICE NG28 guidelines to improve outcomes for type 2 diabetes patients” with a “READ MORE” button.
  • The button linked to a publisher-hosted microsite sponsored by AstraZeneca containing promotional material for Forxiga (dapagliflozin).
  • The email itself did not name AstraZeneca anywhere and did not indicate that the link led to promotional material.
  • AstraZeneca said the publisher sent the email outside the agreed/certified materials and without AstraZeneca’s prior oversight or approval, contrary to the media plan and agreements.
⚖️

Outcome

  • Breach of Clause 3.6 (Disguising promotional material or activities).
  • Breach of Clause 5.5 (Failing to be sufficiently clear as to the company’s role and involvement).
  • Breach of Clause 8.1 (Failing to certify promotional material).
  • No breach of Clause 5.1 (Requirement to maintain high standards at all times).
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free