GSK press release on COVID-19 vaccine efficacy ruled misleading (RRR presented without sufficient context) – AUTH/3760/4/23

📅 2023 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

CaseAUTH/3760/4/23
CompanyGSK
ComplainantContactable member of the public
MaterialPress release on GSK corporate website (stock-exchange announcement; “For media and investors only”)
ProductVidPrevtyn Beta (Sanofi and GSK COVID-19 booster vaccine)
Main issueVaccine efficacy percentages presented without sufficient context (including omission of absolute risk data and lack of comparator/trial detail), potentially misleading
Code year2021
Complaint received04 April 2023
Completed05 June 2024
AppealNo appeal
BreachClause 6.1
No breachClause 5.1
SanctionsUndertaking received; additional sanctions not stated

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
📋

What happened

  • A member of the public complained about a GSK press release on its corporate website about Sanofi and GSK’s COVID-19 booster vaccine VidPrevtyn Beta.
  • The press release stated: “The results showed a 64.7% efficacy against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection… and 75.1% efficacy in participants previously infected with SARS-CoV-2”.
  • The complainant alleged the figures were presented as relative risk reduction (RRR) without mentioning absolute risk reduction (ARR), making the claim misleading.
  • The complainant referenced earlier PMCPA cases on similar issues and alleged GSK also failed to maintain high standards.
  • GSK said the release was a “Stock-exchange announcement” intended for “Media and investors only”, distributed to business/financial media and placed in the website’s Media/Press releases section.
  • After receiving the Authority’s letter, GSK removed the material from its corporate website “out of an abundance of caution”, with the possibility of reinstating it later with corrections.
⚖️

Outcome

  • Breach of Clause 6.1 (Making a misleading claim).
  • No breach of Clause 5.1 (Requirement to maintain high standards at all times).
  • No appeal.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

⭐ Charter Member — Until 31 March

See the full compliance picture for every pharma company

291 Company Intelligence Reports — breach patterns, appeal history, industry ranking, PDF export. £1,999/year £2,499

Get Charter Access →

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free