Valneva: pharmacy training webinar video deemed promotional after product mentions (AUTH/3734/2/23)

📅 8 March 2026 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

Case numberAUTH/3734/2/23
PartiesComplainant v Valneva
MaterialPharmacy organisation webpage and recorded training webinar video hosted on YouTube
AudiencePharmacists and pharmacy staff (intended)
Products mentionedIxiaro, Rabipur, Dukoral
Main issueRecording deemed promotional due to product mentions; missing AE reporting statement; lack of prescribing information handled under high standards; video not certified; disguised promotion
Applicable Code year2021
Complaint received10 February 2023
Case completed4 June 2024
AppealNo appeal
Breach clausesClause 5.1; Clause 8.1; Clause 12.9; clause 15.6
No breach clausesClause 2; Clause 26.1
SanctionsUndertaking received; Additional sanctions: Not stated

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
📋

What happened

  • Valneva participated in a pharmacy organisation’s training webinar for pharmacy staff about setting up/running a travel health and vaccination service.
  • The webinar invite/agenda and a webpage stated the session was “Working in partnership with Valneva UK” and that speakers were provided by Valneva UK Ltd.
  • The slide deck itself contained no medicine references and was certified; however, the recorded webinar (slides + voiceover) included a single mention of Valneva products (Ixiaro, Rabipur and Dukoral), including comments about indications and there being “no competitors in the market”.
  • The recording was hosted on YouTube as “unlisted” and embedded/linked from the pharmacy organisation’s members-only area; the complainant alleged it was publicly available and promotional without required information.
  • The Panel considered the product references meant the webinar recording was promotional material.
⚖️

Outcome

  • Breach of Clause 5.1 Failing to maintain high standards.
  • Breach of Clause 8.1 Failing to certify promotional material.
  • Breach of Clause 12.9 Failing to include a prominent adverse event reporting statement.
  • Breach of clause 15.6 Disguised promotion.
  • No Breach of Clause 2 Requirement that activities or materials must not bring discredit upon, or reduce confidence in, the pharmaceutical industry.
  • No Breach of Clause 26.1 Requirement not to advertise prescription only medicines to the public.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free