Novartis breached Clauses 2, 5.1 and 12.1 after outdated Entresto prescribing information appeared in downloadable HCP portal documents (AUTH/3725/1/23)

📅 2023 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

CaseAUTH/3725/1/23
PartiesComplainant v Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK
ProductEntresto (sacubitril/valsartan)
IssueOutdated prescribing information embedded in downloadable documents on an HCP portal
DocumentsDocument A: “The Affinity Care Heart Failure Pathway”; Document B: “JACC Treatment Algorithm for Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Including Novel Therapies”
PI dates notedDocument A: May 2021; Document B: June 2020; Webpage PI: October 2022
Complaint received10 January 2023
Case completed18 March 2024
Applicable Code2021
Breach clausesClause 2; Clause 5.1 (x3); Clause 12.1 (x2)
No breach clausesClause 8.5 (x2)
SanctionsUndertaking received; Advertisement
AppealNo appeal

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
📋

What happened

  • An anonymous health professional complained about Entresto (sacubitril/valsartan) prescribing information (PI) on Novartis’ UK HCP portal.
  • Two downloadable documents contained older PI than the PI shown on the webpage:
    • Document A: “The Affinity Care Heart Failure Pathway” included PI dated May 2021.
    • Document B: “JACC Treatment Algorithm for Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Including Novel Therapies” included PI dated June 2020 (and Novartis also provided a May 2021 version in its submission, but the Panel said it should have been updated to Oct 2022 regardless).
    • The webpage PI was dated October 2022 (GB and NI split).
  • Novartis argued the most up-to-date PI was accessible via a link at the top of the webpage, but the Panel noted Clause 12.1 requires PI to form part of the material (not be separate), especially for downloadable items.
  • The Panel noted differences between Oct 2022 and June 2020 PI included missing safety-related updates (e.g., “splitting or crushing of tablets is not recommended”, psychiatric disorder warnings/effects, and updated lithium interaction wording including a statement about diuretics increasing lithium toxicity risk).
  • Novartis said it identified the issue on 19 January 2023 and contacted its agency to remove affected materials; the PMCPA notified Novartis of the complaint on 20 January 2023. The Panel reviewed emails and considered there was a lack of urgency until the PMCPA complaint was received.
⚖️

Outcome

  • Breach of Clause 2 (bringing discredit upon, and reducing confidence in, the pharmaceutical industry).
  • Breach of Clause 5.1 (x3) (failing to maintain high standards).
  • Breach of Clause 12.1 (x2) (failing to include up-to-date prescribing information).
  • No breach of Clause 8.5 (x2) (recertification interval of no more than two years) on the narrow ground that two years had not elapsed since certification.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

⭐ Charter Member — Until 31 March

See the full compliance picture for every pharma company

291 Company Intelligence Reports — breach patterns, appeal history, industry ranking, PDF export. £1,999/year £2,499

Get Charter Access →

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free