Novo Nordisk breached Clause 5.5 over unclear involvement in pharmacist obesity hub and documents (AUTH/3711/11/22)

📅 8 March 2026 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

CaseAUTH/3711/11/22
CompanyNovo Nordisk Ltd
ComplainantContactable complainant (concerned UK health professional)
SubjectWeight management and obesity hub on a pharmacist association website; associated downloadable documents; allegations about training links
Applicable Code2021
Complaint received21 November 2022
Case completed09 March 2023
AppealNo appeal
Breach clausesClause 5.5; Clause 5.1
No breach clausesClauses 2, 3.3, 5.1, 5.5, 8.1, 12.1, 15.6 (as listed in the case summary for specific allegations/documents)
SanctionsUndertaking received; Additional sanctions: Not stated
Key issueDisclosure of the company’s exact involvement was not sufficiently clear and prominent at the outset on the hub and four documents

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
📋

What happened

  • A UK health professional complained about a password-protected weight management and obesity “hub” hosted on a UK pharmacist association’s website, developed under a Collaborative Working (CW) project with Novo Nordisk (CW started December 2021).
  • The complainant alleged the hub and associated materials did not clearly state Novo Nordisk’s level of involvement and were intended to promote Novo Nordisk’s product (Saxenda), including via training links and PGD-related content.
  • The hub included a declaration near the top stating the association and Novo Nordisk were “working collaboratively” to support pharmacies, but (per the Panel) did not clearly explain the extent of Novo Nordisk’s involvement (eg funding and co-creation) at the outset.
  • The Panel could not access the hub directly (password protected) and relied on evidence provided, including Novo Nordisk’s certified PDF of the hub (ref UK22OB00237, certified 11 October 2022) and the complainant’s cropped screenshots.
  • Novo Nordisk stated links to a named training provider’s course (previously associated with Case AUTH/3525/6/21) had been removed from the hub by 6 October 2022, before the undertaking in that earlier case was returned (12 October 2022).
  • The Panel assessed whether the hub and downloadable documents clearly declared Novo Nordisk’s role, and whether materials were promotional/disguised promotion and required prescribing information/certification.
⚖️

Outcome

  • Breach: Clause 5.5 (hub page and four documents) for failing to be sufficiently clear about Novo Nordisk’s exact role and involvement at the outset.
  • Breach: Clause 5.1 for failing to maintain high standards (driven by multiple Clause 5.5 failures).
  • No breach: Clause 3.3 (undertaking) and consequently no breach of Clauses 5.1 and 2 in that regard.
  • No breach: Clauses 8.1 and 12.1 (Panel did not accept the documents were promotional or required prescribing information).
  • No breach: Clause 15.6 (not established that the hub/documents were disguised promotion at the time of complaint).
  • No breach: Clause 2 (Panel did not consider the circumstances warranted particular censure).
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free