Teva breached Code over Ajovy HCP registration website: PI link not prominent and black triangle missing at first mention (AUTH/3659/6/22)

📅 8 March 2026 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

CaseAUTH/3659/6/22
PartiesComplainant v Teva
CompanyTeva UK Limited
ProductAjovy (fremanezumab)
MaterialHCP registration website for recorded webinar highlights (lessmigraine.co.uk; ref AJO-UK-00016; Date of Preparation: October 2020)
Applicable Code2021
Complaint received15 June 2022
Case completed19 June 2023
AppealNo appeal
Breach clauses5.1, 12.6, 12.10, 16.1
No breach clauses2, 3.6, 5.1, 6.1, 6.2, 11.2, 26.2
SanctionsUndertaking received; Additional sanctions: Not stated

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
📋

What happened

  • An anonymous, contactable complainant (self-described health professional) complained about a Teva UK registration website for HCPs to access recorded webinar highlights about Ajovy (fremanezumab): lessmigraine.co.uk (ref AJO-UK-00016; Date of Preparation: October 2020).
  • Allegations included: lack of a “public” option on the landing page; alleged disguised promotion; alleged off-label promotion via “difficult-to-treat migraine” wording; missing black triangle at first mention of Ajovy; “Less migraine. More moments.” as a hanging comparison; and lack of a prominent prescribing information (PI) statement/link.
  • The Panel found that promotional content on the registration website was accessible before HCP status was checked/confirmed (ie, before secure login details were issued).
  • The PI link was placed in the footer in smaller font alongside privacy policy/terms, and was not sufficiently prominent.
  • The black triangle was not adjacent to the first mention of Ajovy on the homepage and registration page; the logo with black triangle was in the footer and likely required scrolling.
⚖️

Outcome

  • Breach found for: Clause 5.1, Clause 12.6, Clause 12.10, Clause 16.1.
  • No breach found for: Clauses 2, 3.6, 5.1 (in relation to black triangle issues), 6.1, 6.2, 11.2, 26.2.
  • No breach of off-label promotion (Clause 11.2) was found on the narrow allegations presented; the Panel noted SPC section 5.1 included a study titled “Difficult to treat migraine” and the complainant did not establish otherwise.
  • No breach of disguised promotion (Clause 3.6) was found in the particular circumstances; the landing page stated it was funded and organised by Teva UK Limited and HCPs would likely assume it included promotional content.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free