PMCPA Case
| Case | AUTH/3177/3/19 |
| Parties | Anonymous v Grünenthal |
| Issue | Promotional use of LinkedIn; employee “like” disseminating a post about Qutenza (capsaicin) |
| Platform | |
| Medicine | Qutenza (capsaicin) |
| Key wording in post | “highly effective” and “a real alternative to the current standard of care” |
| Applicable Code year | 2016 |
| Complaint received | 28 March 2019 |
| Case completed | 2 October 2019 |
| Published | May 2020 Code of Practice Review |
| Breach clauses | 4.1, 4.3, 4.9, 9.1, 9.9, 14.1, 26.1, 26.2, 28.1 |
| No breach clauses | 7.10, 16.1, 26.3 |
| Sanctions | Undertaking received; Additional sanctions: Not stated |
| Appeal | No appeal |
Download the full case report (PDF)
Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory
Got a question about this case?
Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.
One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.