AUTH/2934/2/17: Johnson & Johnson breached Clause 4.4 over Nicorette rolling banner missing prominent PI link on first frame

📅 8 March 2026 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

Case numberAUTH/2934/2/17
PartiesHealth professional consultant to a pharmaceutical company v Johnson & Johnson
ProductNicorette (nicotine)
MaterialOnline rolling banner advertisement on Pulse online; headed “Nicorette Do Something Incredible”; referred to combination nicotine replacement therapy (NRT)
ReferenceUK/NI/16-7664
Complaint received08 February 2017
Case completed10 May 2017
Applicable Code year2016
Breach clausesClause 4.4
No breach clausesClauses 4.1, 4.3, 9.1, 11.1, 26.1
SanctionsUndertaking received; additional sanctions not stated
AppealNo appeal

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
đź“‹

What happened

  • A health professional (consultant to Novartis) complained in a private capacity about a Johnson & Johnson online “rolling banner” advertisement for Nicorette (nicotine) on Pulse online (ref UK/NI/16-7664).
  • The banner rotated through four frames over ~10 seconds (each shown ~2.5 seconds) on a continuous loop.
  • Allegations included: no generic name shown; no mention on the ad of where prescribing information (PI) could be found (though available after clicking); the ad was a “teaser”; risk it could appear to the wrong audience; PI was hard to read (single large block).
  • PMCPA applied its approach to private complaints from pharma employees/consultants: Novartis was named in the report to avoid circumventing intercompany complaint procedures.
⚖️

Outcome

  • Breach: Clause 4.4 (PI link not clear and prominent on the first banner).
  • No breach: Clause 4.1 (PI legibility), Clause 4.3 (non-proprietary name), Clause 9.1 (teaser advertising), Clause 11.1 (suitability for audience), Clause 26.1 (promotion of POMs to the public).
  • The Panel considered the ad was aimed at prescribers (Pulse’s main audience) and noted Nicorette was a general sales list (GSL) medicine.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
ÂŁ249/year
Annual — save £99
or
ÂŁ29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free