Bayer voluntary admission: uncertified Levitra symposium invitation sent to UK recipients (transparent envelope, missing PI, unapproved strapline)

📅 8 March 2026 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

Case numberAUTH/2469/12/11
CompanyBayer
TypeVoluntary admission
MaterialSymposium invitation (4-page A5)
ProductLevitra (vardenafil) ODT
EventSatellite symposium at ESSM Congress, Milan (Dec 2011), titled “Men’s changing sexuality, identity and behaviour”
UK recipientsSeventy four invitations sent to UK delegates
Main issuesNot UK-certified; missing prescribing info; missing AE reporting statement; generic name not adjacent to prominent brand; unapproved/inconsistent strapline; transparent envelope exposing branding; sent to some non-HCPs
Complaint received22 December 2011
Case completed13 February 2012
Applicable Code year2011
Breach clauses3.2, 4.1, 4.3, 4.10, 9.1, 9.8, 14.1, 22.1 (x2)
Clause 2No breach
AppealNo appeal
SanctionsUndertaking received (additional sanctions: Not stated)

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
đź“‹

What happened

  • Bayer UK voluntarily informed the PMCPA that a Bayer global (Berlin) invitation to a Bayer-sponsored satellite symposium at the European Society for Sexual Medicine (ESSM) Congress (Milan, Dec 2011) breached the Code.
  • The 4-page A5 invitation prominently featured the Levitra (vardenafil) orodispersible tablets (ODT) logo and promoted Levitra.
  • Bayer global did not treat the invitation as promotional material and therefore did not follow the relevant SOP; UK review/approval was not obtained and the material was not certified for UK use.
  • Seventy four invitations were sent to UK delegates registered for ESSM.
  • The invitation omitted required prescribing information and other obligatory information, including an adverse event reporting statement.
  • The non-proprietary name (vardenafil) was not placed adjacent to the most prominent display of the brand name on the front cover.
  • A strapline stated: “First-line ED therapy he can take anytime, anywhere” (not approved for UK use and inconsistent with dosing limitations).
  • Invitations were mailed in transparent envelopes, allowing the public to see the Levitra logo and infer sexual health use.
  • Some invitations were sent to individuals Bayer understood were not health professionals (employees of another pharmaceutical company and an events agency), and not appropriate administrative staff.
⚖️

Outcome

  • Breach found for: Clauses 3.2, 4.1, 4.3, 4.10, 9.1, 9.8, 14.1, and 22.1 (Clause 22.1 breached twice).
  • No breach of Clause 2 (the Panel did not consider the circumstances warranted the particular censure associated with Clause 2).
  • No appeal.
  • Sanction recorded: Undertaking received.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
ÂŁ249/year
Annual — save £99
or
ÂŁ29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free