Boehringer Ingelheim Pradaxa website: prescribing information not signposted on first HCP landing page (Clause 4.6)

📅 8 March 2026 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

Case numberAUTH/2444/10/11
ComplainantGeneral practitioner
CompanyBoehringer Ingelheim Limited
ProductPradaxa (dabigatran)
MaterialPradaxa.co.uk website (HCP and patient/public sections)
Complaint received19 October 2011
Case completed19 January 2012
Applicable Code year2011
Breach clausesClause 4.6
No breach clausesClauses 7.2, 22.1, 22.2, 24.1
AppealYes (by complainant); unsuccessful (no breach of 22.1 and 22.2 upheld)
SanctionsUndertaking received

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
📋

What happened

  • A general practitioner complained about Boehringer Ingelheim’s Pradaxa (dabigatran) website (Pradaxa.co.uk).
  • The complaint alleged the HCP section was not sufficiently access-restricted and effectively facilitated promotion of a prescription-only medicine to the public.
  • The complaint also alleged the stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF) section was misleading because it did not reference the 75mg dose.
  • The complaint further alleged that the location of prescribing information was only clarified after prominent promotional content appeared.
⚖️

Outcome

  • No breach of Clause 22.1 (advertising POMs to the public) regarding the open-access HCP material; upheld on appeal.
  • No breach of Clause 22.2 (information to the public) regarding the access arrangements; upheld on appeal.
  • No breach of Clause 24.1 in relation to the access arrangements (Panel ruling; Appeal Board did not need to consider after upholding no breach of 22.1/22.2).
  • No breach of Clause 7.2 regarding omission of the 75mg dose in the SPAF section.
  • Breach of Clause 4.6 because the first HCP page (after confirming HCP status) referred to licensed indications but did not indicate where prescribing information could be found.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free