AUTH/2283/12/09: Lundbeck breached Clause 4.7 over prescribing information location statement size/placement in Cipralex ad

📅 8 March 2026 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

Case numberAUTH/2283/12/09
ComplainantAnonymous
CompanyLundbeck Ltd
ProductCipralex (escitalopram)
MaterialTwo-page advertisement in The Pharmaceutical Journal (28 November 2009)
IssueStatement “For references and prescribing information, see overleaf” too small (1.7mm x-height) and not on the outer edge
Applicable Code year2008
Clauses breachedClause 4.7
Complaint received02 December 2009
Case completed26 January 2010
AppealNo appeal
SanctionsUndertaking received

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
📋

What happened

  • An anonymous complainant challenged a two-page Cipralex (escitalopram) advertisement placed by Lundbeck in The Pharmaceutical Journal (28 November 2009).
  • The ad included the statement “For references and prescribing information, see overleaf”.
  • The complainant alleged the statement was too small to meet the Code requirement (lower case “x” no less than 2mm in height) when prescribing information is overleaf.
  • Lundbeck confirmed the copy sent to the journal used a lower case font size of 1.7mm for that statement.
⚖️

Outcome

  • Breach found: Clause 4.7.
  • The Panel also noted the statement was not on the outer edge of the advertisement as required by the Code.
  • No appeal.
  • Sanction recorded as: undertaking received.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free