ProStrakan breach for ‘rapid relief from 10 minutes’ claim for Abstral

📅 8 March 2026 | 🖉 Dr Anzal Qurbain
📊

Key facts

Case numberAUTH/2207/2/09
Case referenceCephalon v ProStrakan (Promotion of Abstral)
ComplainantCephalon (UK) Limited
Respondent/companyProStrakan Ltd
Product(s)Abstral (sublingual fentanyl citrate tablet)
Material/channelTwo leavepieces (MO17/0070 and MO17/0101)
Key issueClaim “Rapid relief of breakthrough cancer pain from 10 minutes” inconsistent with Abstral SPC (SPC supported significant relief from 15 minutes onwards)
Dates (received/completed if stated)Received 11 February 2009; completed 16 March 2009
AppealNot stated
Code yearNot stated
Breaches/clausesClause 3.2
SanctionsNo explicit additional sanctions stated beyond the required undertaking/corrective actions described in the report

Download the full case report (PDF)


Reviewed by Dr Anzal Qurbain (FFPM) — ABPI Final Signatory

🤖

Got a question about this case?

Ask one of our 13 specialist ABPI advisors — instant answers, 24/7.

Ask AskAnzal AI
📋

What happened

  • Cephalon (UK) Limited complained about ProStrakan Ltd’s promotion of Abstral (sublingual fentanyl citrate tablet).
  • The materials at issue were two leavepieces (refs MO17/0070 and MO17/0101).
  • The claim challenged was: “Rapid relief of breakthrough cancer pain from 10 minutes”.
  • The claim was referenced in the leavepieces to “data on file” (Study EN3267-005).
  • Cephalon alleged the claim was inconsistent with the Abstral summary of product characteristics (SPC), which stated significantly superior relief versus placebo from 15 minutes after administration onwards.
  • ProStrakan argued the claim was supported by Phase III study EN3267-005 data and was referenced as such in the materials.
⚖️

Outcome

  • The Panel ruled that the “from 10 minutes” claim, although based on study EN3267-005, was inconsistent with the particulars listed in the Abstral SPC.
  • The Panel ruled a breach of Clause 3.2 of the Code.
  • Complaint received: 11 February 2009.
  • Case completed: 16 March 2009.
🔒

Unlock the full case analysis

Members get the complete breakdown — Clauses, Sanction, Signatory Lens, Audit checklist, and 3 Key Questions.

Best value
£249/year
Annual — save £99
or
£29/mo
Monthly
Join Now — Instant Access

📰 Weekly PMCPA Case Breakdown

One real case. One key lesson. Every week — free.

Subscribe Free